Literature DB >> 31768176

Clinical Outcome: Patient and Partner Satisfaction after Penile Implant Surgery.

Cedric Jorissen1, Helene De Bruyna1, Evert Baten1, Koenraad Van Renterghem2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common disorder, which affects at least 50% of males aged 50-70 years. According to EAU Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction, implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is a valid, third-line therapeutic option for treatment of ED.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective single centre study to analyze mechanical reliability, complication rate, patient satisfaction and quality of life after penile prosthesis implantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 126 electronic patient files after primary implantation of an IPP during a 5-year period were investigated. A structured telephone interview concerning patient and partner satisfaction was conducted at least 1 year after implant surgery.
RESULTS: We found that 15 patients (11.9%) had revision surgery for various reasons. Mechanical failure occurred in 7.14% of the patients and was the main reason for revision surgery. Other major complications and complaints were loss of penile length (18.53%), postoperative pain (11.9%) and altered sensation (8.73%). No patients required explantation for infection, and 1 patient (0.79%) underwent revision surgery for an imminent erosion. One year or more after surgery, the patient and partner satisfaction rates, were 83.2 and 85.4%, respectively. We observed very high patient and partner satisfaction rates for the implantation of an IPP, with improvement of the general quality of life. These rates are negatively influenced by the occurrence of postoperative complications and complaints such as postoperative penile length shortening, pain and floppy glans syndrome. Most patients regain sexual function 6 weeks after surgery with no or minimal effect on the orgasm.
CONCLUSION: The implantation of a 3-piece IPP has proven an effective, third-line treatment for patients with ED.
Copyright © 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile dysfunction; Inflatable penile prosthesis; Patient satisfaction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31768176      PMCID: PMC6872984          DOI: 10.1159/000499286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  19 in total

1.  Nikolaj A. Bogoraz (1874-1952): pioneer of phalloplasty and penile implant surgery.

Authors:  Dirk Schultheiss; Alexander I Gabouev; Udo Jonas
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Penile prosthesis implantation and couple's satisfaction.

Authors:  M Porena; L Mearini; E Mearini; M Marzi; A Zucchi
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Floppy Glans Syndrome: Pathogenesis and Treatment.

Authors:  Michael Bickell; Neil Manimala; Justin Parker; Brian Steixner; Lucas Wiegand; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 4.  Long-term outcomes of inflatable penile implants: reliability, patient satisfaction and complication management.

Authors:  A G Anastasiadis; S K Wilson; M Burchardt; R Shabsigh
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study.

Authors:  H A Feldman; I Goldstein; D G Hatzichristou; R J Krane; J B McKinlay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades.

Authors:  Steven K Wilson; John R Delk; Emad A Salem; Mario A Cleves
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 7.  Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Edgardo F Becher; Anthony J Bella; William O Brant; Tobias S Kohler; Juan Ignacio Martinez-Salamanca; Landon Trost; Allen F Morey
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Raymond M Bernal; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-26

Review 9.  Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Gopal L Narang; Bradley D Figler; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 10.  Special considerations for placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis for the patient with Peyronie's disease: techniques and patient preference.

Authors:  Matthew D Lyons; Culley C Carson; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-07-27
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices.

Authors:  Abida Sultana; Peter Grice; Josip Vukina; Ian Pearce; Vaibhav Modgil
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis in men who have sex with men are high.

Authors:  Justin La; Charles A Loeb; David W Barham; Jake Miller; Eric Chung; Martin S Gross; Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Sung Hun Park; Paul E Perito; Alfredo Suarez-Sarmiento; Koenraad Van Renterghem; Faysal A Yafi
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Under-recognized factors affecting penile implant satisfaction in patients.

Authors:  Julie Wong; Luke Witherspoon; Ryan K Flannigan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.052

4.  Bulbar urethrocavernous fistula in setting of inflatable penile prosthesis: a case report.

Authors:  Hannah Botkin; Brian Barnes; Amy Pearlman
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Enhanced recovery strategies after penile implantation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ellis; Architha Sudhakar; Jay Simhan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.