Literature DB >> 24735105

Pre-test genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer delivered by non-genetics professionals in the state of Florida.

S T Vadaparampil1, C L Scherr, D Cragun, T L Malo, T Pal.   

Abstract

Genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer now includes practitioners from multiple healthcare professions, specialties, and settings. This study examined whether non-genetics professionals (NGPs) perform guideline-based patient intake and informed consent before genetic testing. NGPs offering BRCA testing services in Florida (n = 386) were surveyed about clinical practices. Among 81 respondents (response rate = 22%), approximately half reported: sometimes scheduling a separate session for pre-test counseling lasting 11-30 min prior to testing, discussing familial implications of testing, benefits and limitations of risk management options, and discussing the potential psychological impact and insurance-related issues. Few constructed a three-generation pedigree, discussed alternative hereditary cancer syndromes, or the meaning of a variant result. This lack of adherence to guideline-based practice may result in direct harm to patients and their family members. NGPs who are unable to deliver guideline adherent cancer genetics services should focus on identification and referral of at-risk patients to in person or telephone services provided by genetics professionals.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; genetic counseling; genetic testing; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; non-genetics professionals

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24735105      PMCID: PMC4394045          DOI: 10.1111/cge.12405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  23 in total

Review 1.  The genetic testing process: how much counseling is needed?

Authors:  S Cummings
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Adverse events in cancer genetic testing: medical, ethical, legal, and financial implications.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Erica Blouch; Whitney Cogswell; Jeanne P Homer; Debbie Pencarinha; Christine L Stanislaw; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Outcomes from intensive training in genetic cancer risk counseling for clinicians.

Authors:  Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Charite Ricker; Sharon Sand; Gwen C Uman; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Bronson D Riley; Julie O Culver; Cécile Skrzynia; Leigha A Senter; June A Peters; Josephine W Costalas; Faith Callif-Daley; Sherry C Grumet; Katherine S Hunt; Rebecca S Nagy; Wendy C McKinnon; Nancie M Petrucelli; Robin L Bennett; Angela M Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.

Authors:  L Wideroff; S T Vadaparampil; M H Greene; S Taplin; L Olson; A N Freedman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing--Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  A statewide survey of practitioners to assess knowledge and clinical practices regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Deborah Cragun; Courtney Lewis; Andrea Doty; Maria Rodriguez; Cristi Radford; Zachary Thompson; Jongphil Kim; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors service delivery model task force: a proposal to define models, components, and modes of referral.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Shanna L Gustafson; Monica L Marvin; Bronson D Riley; Wendy R Uhlmann; S Bonnie Liebers; Julie A Rousseau
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Physicians' experiences with BRCA1/2 testing in community settings.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Kathryn A Stoeckert; Meredith M Regan; Lisa DiGianni; Judy E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Authors:  D M Eccles; G Mitchell; A N A Monteiro; R Schmutzler; F J Couch; A B Spurdle; E B Gómez-García
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  The Ethics of Delivering Precision Medicine-Pretest Counseling and Somatic Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Hala T Borno; Jennifer R Rider; Christine M Gunn
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Barbara Biesecker; Jennifer Ivanovich; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Referral frequency, attrition rate, and outcomes of germline testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Evan J Walker; Julia Carnevale; Christina Pedley; Amie Blanco; Salina Chan; Eric A Collisson; Margaret A Tempero; Andrew H Ko
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Laurie E Steffen; Barbara H Brumbach; Wendy Kohlmann; Ruofei Du; Ji-Hyun Lee; Amanda Gammon; Karin Butler; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Megan E Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  "It was an Emotional Baby": Previvors' Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Marleah Dean; Emily A Rauscher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Patterns and predictors of genetic referral among ovarian cancer patients at a National Cancer Institute-Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Adrianne R Mallen; Claire C Conley; Mary K Townsend; Ali Wells; Bernadette M Boac; Sarah Todd; Anjalika Gandhi; Michelle Kuznicki; Bianca M Augusto; McKenzie McIntyre; Brooke L Fridley; Shelley S Tworoger; Robert M Wenham; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Courtney Scherr; Lucia Camperlengo; Susan T Vadaparampil; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Lifestyle Risk Factors Among People Who Have Had Cancer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  John M Quillin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.