Literature DB >> 15254451

Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing--Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003.

.   

Abstract

Breast and ovarian cancer are the second and fifth leading causes of cancer death, respectively, among women in the United States. One in eight women will have breast cancer during their lifetimes, and one in 70 will have ovarian cancer. Mutations in two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2), are associated with predisposition for inherited breast and ovarian cancer and are identified in 5%-10% of women with breast or ovarian cancer (BOC). Since 1996, genetic testing for these mutations has been available clinically; however, population-based screening is not recommended because of the complexity of test interpretation and limited data on clinical validity and utility. Despite the test's limited applicability in the general population, the U.S. provider of clinical BRCA1/2 testing (Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah) conducted a pilot direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing campaign in two cities (Atlanta, Georgia, and Denver, Colorado) during September 2002-February 2003. Although DTC advertisements have been used to raise consumer awareness about pharmaceuticals, this was the first time an established genetic test was marketed to the public. To assess the impact of the campaign on consumer behaviors and health-care provider practices, CDC and the respective state health departments for the pilot cities and two comparison cities (Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina, and Seattle, Washington) surveyed consumers and providers. This report summarizes results of those surveys, which indicated that consumer and provider awareness of BRCA1/2 testing increased in the pilot cities and that providers in these cities perceived an impact on their practice (e.g., more questions asked about testing, more BRCA1/2 tests requested, and more tests ordered). However, in all four cities, providers often lacked knowledge to advise patients about inherited BOC and testing. These findings underscore the need for evidence-based recommendations on appropriate use of genetic tests and education of providers and the public to achieve maximum individual and public health benefit from genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15254451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  23 in total

1.  Multilevel research and the challenges of implementing genomic medicine.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Ralph J Coates; Mary L Fennell; Russell E Glasgow; Maren T Scheuner; Sheri D Schully; Marc S Williams; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

2.  Screen positive rates among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in four cohorts of women.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; Glenn E Palomaki; Heather Hampel; Judith A Westman; James E Haddow
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Media coverage of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  John Lynch; Ashley Parrott; Robert J Hopkin; Melanie Myers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  BRCA testing in unaffected young women in the United States, 2006-2017.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Matthew Scholl; Erika L Fuchs; Abbey B Berenson; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Use of BRCA Mutation Test in the U.S., 2004-2014.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Jacqueline M Hirth; Yu-Li Lin; Gwyn Richardson; Lyuba Levine; Abbey B Berenson; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  A pilot study of knowledge and interest of genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome among Puerto Rican women.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Julie Dutil; Marieva Puig; Teri L Malo; Jessica McIntyre; Rossybelle Perales; Euna M August; Zuheily Closser
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-07-12

8.  Oncologists' Selection of Genetic and Molecular Testing in the Evolving Landscape of Stage II Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Aparna R Parikh; Nancy L Keating; Pang-Hsiang Liu; Stacy W Gray; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine L Kahn; David A Haggstrom; Sapna Syngal; Benjamin Kim
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Too many referrals of low-risk women for BRCA1/2 genetic services by family physicians.

Authors:  Della Brown White; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Awareness of cancer susceptibility genetic testing: the 2000, 2005, and 2010 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  Phuong L Mai; Susan Thomas Vadaparampil; Nancy Breen; Timothy S McNeel; Louise Wideroff; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.