Literature DB >> 30267352

Referral frequency, attrition rate, and outcomes of germline testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Evan J Walker1, Julia Carnevale1,2, Christina Pedley2,3, Amie Blanco2,3, Salina Chan2,3, Eric A Collisson1,2, Margaret A Tempero1,2, Andrew H Ko4,5.   

Abstract

Hereditary predisposition is estimated to account for 10% of all pancreatic cancer cases. However, referral patterns and clinical workflow for germline testing in this disease differ significantly by institution, and many at-risk patients may not undergo appropriate counseling and testing. We undertook an analysis of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PDAC) who were referred to the Clinical Genetics program of a high-volume academic center over a 3-year period to assess referral frequency, evaluate the yield of germline testing in this selected patient cohort, and elucidate the reasons individuals did not undergo recommended germline testing. Medical records of patients with PDAC referred for genetic counseling between January 2015 and October 2017 were reviewed for demographic, medical/family history, and disease-specific data. If testing did not occur, reasons were documented. Genetic test results were categorized as negative, variants of unknown significance, or established pathogenic mutations. Descriptive statistics included means with standard deviations; associations were analyzed with t test and Fisher's exact test. 32% (137 of 432) of PDAC patients were referred for genetic counseling, but only 64% attended their appointment and 60% ultimately underwent germline testing. Common reasons for attrition included worsening disease severity, lack of patient follow-up, insurance concerns, and logistic/travel challenges. Pathogenic germline mutations were detected in 20% (16 of 82) of patients tested, distributed across races/ethnicities, and significantly associated with younger age and positive family history of breast cancer. PDAC patients frequently do not undergo genetic counseling/germline testing despite appropriate referrals, highlighting a need to develop streamlined processes to engage more patients in testing, especially those with high-risk features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic counseling; Germline testing; Pancreatic cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30267352     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-018-0106-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  40 in total

1.  Evaluating Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Challenges and Recommendations.

Authors:  Zishuo I Hu; Jinru Shia; Zsofia K Stadler; Anna M Varghese; Marinela Capanu; Erin Salo-Mullen; Maeve A Lowery; Luis A Diaz; Diana Mandelker; Kenneth H Yu; Alice Zervoudakis; David P Kelsen; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; David S Klimstra; Leonard B Saltz; Ibrahim H Sahin; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Cystic fibrosis gene mutations and pancreatitis risk: relation to epithelial ion transport and trypsin inhibitor gene mutations.

Authors:  P G Noone; Z Zhou; L M Silverman; P S Jowell; M R Knowles; J A Cohn
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Association Between Inherited Germline Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Chunling Hu; Steven N Hart; Eric C Polley; Rohan Gnanaolivu; Hermela Shimelis; Kun Y Lee; Jenna Lilyquist; Jie Na; Raymond Moore; Samuel O Antwi; William R Bamlet; Kari G Chaffee; John DiCarlo; Zhong Wu; Raed Samara; Pashtoon M Kasi; Robert R McWilliams; Gloria M Petersen; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Complete cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene sequencing in patients with idiopathic chronic pancreatitis and controls.

Authors:  F U Weiss; P Simon; N Bogdanova; J Mayerle; B Dworniczak; J Horst; M M Lerch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  FANCP/SLX4: a Swiss army knife of DNA interstrand crosslink repair.

Authors:  Kelly E Cybulski; Niall G Howlett
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  The CHEK2 gene I157T mutation and other alterations in its proximity increase the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer in the Czech population.

Authors:  Zdenek Kleibl; Ondrej Havranek; Ivona Hlavata; Jan Novotny; Jan Sevcik; Petr Pohlreich; Pavel Soucek
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility.

Authors:  Mark E Robson; Angela R Bradbury; Banu Arun; Susan M Domchek; James M Ford; Heather L Hampel; Stephen M Lipkin; Sapna Syngal; Dana S Wollins; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Genetic Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Mary Linton B Peters; Jennifer F Tseng; Rebecca A Miksad
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: black and Hispanic women particularly at risk.

Authors:  Douglas E Levy; Stacey D Byfield; Catherine B Comstock; Judy E Garber; Sapna Syngal; William H Crown; Alexandra E Shields
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mainstreaming germline genetic testing for patients with pancreatic cancer increases uptake.

Authors:  Mitchell L Ramsey; Jewel Tomlinson; Rachel Pearlman; Laith Abushahin; Amber Aeilts; Hui-Zi Chen; Yan Chen; Ashley Compton; Rifat Elkhatib; Levi Geiger; John Hays; Joanne Jeter; Ning Jin; Pannaga Malalur; Sameek Roychowdhury; Jessica Ruple; Jennifer Prebish; Peter P Stanich; Heather Hampel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 2.  Dilemma and Challenge of Immunotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Jianting Cai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Implementation of an Embedded In-Clinic Genetic Testing Station to Optimize Germline Testing for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Evan J Walker; Dena Goldberg; Kelly M Gordon; Christina Pedley; Julia Carnevale; Pelin Cinar; Eric A Collisson; Margaret A Tempero; Andrew H Ko; Amie M Blanco; Mallika Dhawan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-09-20

4.  Burden of hereditary cancer susceptibility in unselected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma referred for germline screening.

Authors:  Carol Cremin; Michael Kuan-Ching Lee; Quan Hong; Carolyn Hoeschen; Anna Mackenzie; Katherine Dixon; Mary McCullum; Jennifer Nuk; Steve Kalloger; Joanna Karasinska; Charles Scudamore; Peter T W Kim; Fergal Donnellan; Eric C S Lam; Howard J Lim; Cynthia L Neben; Will Stedden; Alicia Y Zhou; David F Schaeffer; Sophie Sun; Daniel J Renouf; Kasmintan A Schrader
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 5.  Therapeutic advances in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a focus on targeted therapies.

Authors:  Anthony Turpin; Cindy Neuzillet; Elise Colle; Nelson Dusetti; Rémy Nicolle; Jérôme Cros; Louis de Mestier; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Pascal Hammel
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.485

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.