Literature DB >> 29508181

Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces.

Stephanie A Cohen1, Megan E Tucker2.   

Abstract

A previous study of genetic counselors (GCs) in the state of Indiana identified movement out of clinical positions within the past 2 years. The aims of this study were to determine if this trend is nationwide and identify reasons why GCs are leaving their positions and factors that might help employers attract and retain GCs. An email was sent to members of the American Board of Genetic Counseling with a link to an online confidential survey. There were 939 responses (23.5% response rate). Overall, 52% of GCs report being highly satisfied in their current position, although almost two thirds think about leaving and one third had changed jobs within the past 2 years. Of those who had changed jobs (n = 295), 74.9% had been working in a hospital/clinic setting but only 46.3% currently do, demonstrating a major shift out of the clinic (p < 0.001). The top three reasons cited for leaving a position were work environment/institutional climate, salary/benefits, and a lack of feeling valued/recognized as a professional. These results confirm that GCs are moving out of clinical positions and document elements of job satisfaction. We suggest points for employers to consider when trying to recruit or retain GCs.

Keywords:  Genetic counseling; Genetic counselors; Job satisfaction; Workforce

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508181     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0242-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

1.  Improving Molecular Genetic Test Utilization through Order Restriction, Test Review, and Guidance.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Riley; Gary W Procop; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Robert Wyllie; Felicitas L Lacbawan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Genetic Counselor Workforce Issues: a Survey of Genetic Counselors Licensed in the State of Indiana.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Megan E Tucker; Paula Delk
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Understanding the factors that determine registered nurses' turnover intentions.

Authors:  Joseph Osuji; Faith-Michael Uzoka; Flora Aladi; Mohammed El-Hussein
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Adverse events in cancer genetic testing: the third case series.

Authors:  Danielle C Bonadies; Karina L Brierley; Rachel E Barnett; Melanie D Baxter; Talia Donenberg; Whitney L Ducaine; Michelle E Ernst; Michelle E Ernstx; Jeanne Homer; Megan Judkins; Niki M Lovick; Jacquelyn M Powers; Christine Stanislaw; Elizabeth Stark; Rio C Stenner; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Improving staff retention and career progression.

Authors:  Lorraine Szeremeta; Natalie Shamash
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  2016 May 4-10

6.  Pre-test genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer delivered by non-genetics professionals in the state of Florida.

Authors:  S T Vadaparampil; C L Scherr; D Cragun; T L Malo; T Pal
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  It's time to ramp up genetic counseling training.

Authors:  Myra I Roche; Anne E Greb
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Differences in BRCA counseling and testing practices based on ordering provider type.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Lucia Camperlengo; Emily Robinson; Meghan Caldwell; Jongphil Kim; Catherine Phelan; Alvaro N Monteiro; Susan T Vadaparampil; Thomas A Sellers; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Non-genetic health professionals' attitude towards, knowledge of and skills in discussing and ordering genetic testing for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten F L Douma; Ellen M A Smets; Dawn C Allain
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  2 in total

1.  Response to Commercial Genetic Testing and the Future of the Genetic Counseling Profession.

Authors:  McKinsey L Goodenberger; Brittany C Thomas; Teresa Kruisselbrink
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Access to Genetic Counselors in the Southern United States.

Authors:  Catalina Villegas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.