Literature DB >> 24722057

Functional haemodynamic monitoring.

Michael R Pinsky1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Functional haemodynamic monitoring is the assessment of the dynamic interactions of haemodynamic variables in response to a defined perturbation. RECENT
FINDINGS: Fluid responsiveness can be predicted during positive pressure breathing by variations in venous return or left ventricular output using numerous surrogate markers, such as arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV), left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV), aortic velocity variation, inferior and superior vena cavae diameter changes and pulse oximeter pleth signal variability. Similarly, dynamic changes in cardiac output to a passive leg raising manoeuvre can be used in any patient and measured invasively or noninvasively. However, volume responsiveness, though important, reflects only part of the overall spectrum of functional physiological variables that can be measured to define physiologic state and monitor response to therapy. The ratio of PPV to SVV defines central arterial elastance and can be used to identify those hypotensive patients who will not increase their blood pressure in response to a fluid challenge despite increasing cardiac output. Dynamic tissue O2 saturation (StO2) responses to complete stop flow conditions, as can be created by measuring hand StO2 and occluding flow with a blood pressure cuff, assesses cardiovascular sufficiency and micro-circulatory blood flow distribution. They can be used to identify those ventilator-dependent individuals who will fail a spontaneous breathing trial or trauma patients in need of life-saving interventions.
SUMMARY: Functional haemodynamic monitoring approaches are increasing in numbers, conditions in which they are useful and resuscitation protocol applications. This is a rapidly evolving field whose pluripotential is just now being realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24722057      PMCID: PMC4324536          DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  37 in total

1.  Case scenario: respiratory variations in arterial pressure for guiding fluid management in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Matthieu Biais; Alexandre Ouattara; Gérard Janvier; François Sztark
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Prognostic implications of tissue oxygen saturation in human septic shock.

Authors:  J Mesquida; C Espinal; G Gruartmoner; J Masip; C Sabatier; F Baigorri; M R Pinsky; A Artigas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection.

Authors:  J J Vos; A F Kalmar; M M R F Struys; J K G Wietasch; H G D Hendriks; T W L Scheeren
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock.

Authors:  Feras Hatib; Jos R C Jansen; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-06-23

5.  Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael J Lanspa; Colin K Grissom; Eliotte L Hirshberg; Jason P Jones; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation.

Authors:  C Slagt; I Malagon; A B J Groeneveld
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Alex Levitov; Alisha Young; Lois Andrews
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Fluid challenge: tracking changes in cardiac output with blood pressure monitoring (invasive or non-invasive).

Authors:  Karim Lakhal; Stephan Ehrmann; Dominique Perrotin; Michel Wolff; Thierry Boulain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Pulse pressure variation does not reflect stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated rats with lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia.

Authors:  Thomas G V Cherpanath; Lonneke Smeding; Wim K Lagrand; Alexander Hirsch; Marcus J Schultz; Johan A B Groeneveld
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.557

10.  Noninvasive assessment of acute dyspnea in the ED.

Authors:  Xaime García; Peter Simon; Francis X Guyette; Ravi Ramani; Rene Alvarez; Jorge Quintero; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  22 in total

1.  Predicting the determinants of volume responsiveness.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Can one size fit all? The fine line between fluid overload and hypovolemia.

Authors:  Thierry Boulain; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Second derivative multispectral algorithm for quantitative assessment of cutaneous tissue oxygenation.

Authors:  Jiwei Huang; Shiwu Zhang; Surya Gnyawali; Chandan K Sen; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  The International Activities in Taiwan by the Joint Burn Care Assistance Team of Physicians from Japan Medical Association and Three Medical Societies.

Authors:  Naoyuki Matsuda; Sachiko Yamada; Takuga Hinoshita; Junichi Sasaki; Hiroto Ikeda; Nobuyuki Harunari; Tetsuya Sakamoto
Journal:  Japan Med Assoc J       Date:  2016-07-01

5.  Defining the boundaries of preload responsiveness at the bedside.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Applying mean systemic filling pressure to assess the response to fluid boluses in cardiac post-surgical patients.

Authors:  Kapil Gupta; Soren Sondergaard; Geoffrey Parkin; Mark Leaning; Anders Aneman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The use of pulse pressure variation for predicting impairment of microcirculatory blood flow.

Authors:  Christoph R Behem; Michael F Graessler; Till Friedheim; Rahel Kluttig; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Anna Duprée; E Sebastian Debus; Daniel A Reuter; Sabine H Wipper; Constantin J C Trepte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Colorectal Surgery in Critically Unwell Patients: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Ashwin Subramaniam; Robert Wengritzky; Stewart Skinner; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 9.  The Intensivist's Perspective of Shock, Volume Management, and Hemodynamic Monitoring.

Authors:  Kianoush Kashani; Tarig Omer; Andrew D Shaw
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 10.614

10.  Reliability of Passive Leg Raising, Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Observational Study.

Authors:  Christoph Karl Hofer; Martin Geisen; Sonja Hartnack; Omer Dzemali; Michael Thomas Ganter; Andreas Zollinger
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.