Literature DB >> 24431387

Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation.

C Slagt1, I Malagon, A B J Groeneveld.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The FloTrac/Vigileo™, introduced in 2005, uses arterial pressure waveform analysis to calculate cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume variation (SVV) without external calibration. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the performance of the system. Sixty-five full manuscripts on validation of CO measurements in humans, published in English, were retrieved; these included 2234 patients and 44,592 observations.
RESULTS: have been analysed according to underlying patient conditions, that is, general critical illness and surgery as normodynamic conditions, cardiac and (post)cardiac surgery as hypodynamic conditions, and liver surgery and sepsis as hyperdynamic conditions, and subsequently released software versions. Eight studies compared SVV with other dynamic indices. CO, bias, precision, %error, correlation, and concordance differed among underlying conditions, subsequent software versions, and their interactions, suggesting increasing accuracy and precision, particularly in hypo- and normodynamic conditions. The bias and the trending capacity remain dependent on (changes in) vascular tone with most recent software. The SVV only moderately agreed with other dynamic indices, although it was helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in 85% of studies addressing this. Since its introduction, the performance of uncalibrated FloTrac/Vigileo™ has improved particularly in hypo- and normodynamic conditions. A %error at or below 30% with most recent software allows sufficiently accurate and precise CO measurements and trending for routine clinical use in normo- and hypodynamic conditions, in the absence of large changes in vascular tone. The SVV may usefully supplement these measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparing cardiac output; haemodynamic optimization; stroke volume variations; uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24431387     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  40 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Alexandre Joosten; Linda Suk-Ling Murphy; Olivier Desebbe; Brenton Alexander; Sang-Hyun Kim; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Continuous cardiac output measurement by un-calibrated pulse wave analysis and pulmonary artery catheter in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Jamal A Alhashemi; Adel M Al-Shabasy; Ursina M Schmid; Peter Schott; Sanaa A Shalabi; Ahmed M Badri; Sonja Hartnack; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Intraoperative monitoring of stroke volume variation versus central venous pressure in laparoscopic liver surgery: a randomized prospective comparative trial.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Raffaella Reineke; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Laura Comotti; Luigi Beretta; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Sanders; S Servaas; C Slagt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  [Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults].

Authors:  G Pestel; K Fukui; M Higashi; I Schmidtmann; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots.

Authors:  Teiji Sawa; Mao Kinoshita; Atsushi Kainuma; Koichi Akiyama; Yoshifumi Naito; Hideya Kato; Fumimasa Amaya; Keiji Shigemi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul; Bernd Saugel; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Christoph K Hofer; Xavier Monnet; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Daniel A Reuter; Andrew Rhodes; Pierre Squara; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Cardiac output monitoring: less invasiveness, less accuracy?

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Julia Y Wagner; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.

Authors:  Lisa Sangkum; Geoffrey L Liu; Ling Yu; Hong Yan; Alan D Kaye; Henry Liu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 10.  Pulse waveform hemodynamic monitoring devices: recent advances and the place in goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Adham Hendy; Şerban Bubenek
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.