PURPOSE: To evaluate an analogue of mean systemic filling pressure (P(msa)) and derived variables to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of volume expansion in increasing cardiac output. METHODS: Sixty-one cardiac post-surgical patients were studied and 107 fluid boluses were captured. Cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and right atrial pressure were recorded with P msa before and after a bolus fluid. An increase in cardiac output greater than 10 % following a fluid bolus defined a patient as a responder. Cardiac power (i.e. the product of arterial pressure and cardiac output) and P(msa) to right atrial pressure gradient (i.e. the driving pressure for venous return and hence cardiac output) were evaluated to assess the efficiency of volume expansion to increase cardiac output. Cardiac power relative to P(msa) (CP(vol)), its dynamic changes and the dynamic changes in P msa-right atrial pressure gradient relative to the P(msa) change (E(vol)) were investigated. RESULTS: CP(vol) was lower and E(vol) was higher in responders vs. non-responders. Furthermore, in patients receiving a second fluid bolus, E(vol) correlated with the degree of increase in cardiac output. Multivariate regression analysis identified both CP(vol) and E(vol) as independent variables associated with volume responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Using an algorithm to derive a mean systemic filling pressure analogue, cardiac power and dynamic measures of the venous return pressure gradient relative to the mean systemic filling pressure provided an assessment of the efficiency of volume expansion in post-surgical cardiac patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate an analogue of mean systemic filling pressure (P(msa)) and derived variables to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of volume expansion in increasing cardiac output. METHODS: Sixty-one cardiac post-surgical patients were studied and 107 fluid boluses were captured. Cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and right atrial pressure were recorded with P msa before and after a bolus fluid. An increase in cardiac output greater than 10 % following a fluid bolus defined a patient as a responder. Cardiac power (i.e. the product of arterial pressure and cardiac output) and P(msa) to right atrial pressure gradient (i.e. the driving pressure for venous return and hence cardiac output) were evaluated to assess the efficiency of volume expansion to increase cardiac output. Cardiac power relative to P(msa) (CP(vol)), its dynamic changes and the dynamic changes in P msa-right atrial pressure gradient relative to the P(msa) change (E(vol)) were investigated. RESULTS: CP(vol) was lower and E(vol) was higher in responders vs. non-responders. Furthermore, in patients receiving a second fluid bolus, E(vol) correlated with the degree of increase in cardiac output. Multivariate regression analysis identified both CP(vol) and E(vol) as independent variables associated with volume responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Using an algorithm to derive a mean systemic filling pressure analogue, cardiac power and dynamic measures of the venous return pressure gradient relative to the mean systemic filling pressure provided an assessment of the efficiency of volume expansion in post-surgical cardiac patients.
Authors: Y Mahjoub; V Lejeune; L Muller; S Perbet; L Zieleskiewicz; F Bart; B Veber; C Paugam-Burtz; S Jaber; A Ayham; E Zogheib; S Lasocki; A Vieillard-Baron; H Quintard; O Joannes-Boyau; G Plantefève; P Montravers; S Duperret; M Lakhdari; N Ammenouche; E Lorne; M Slama; H Dupont Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2013-12-29 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: R P Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Anders Aneman; Nicholas Brechot; Daniel Brodie; Frances Colreavy; John Fraser; Charles Gomersall; Peter McCanny; Peter Hasse Moller-Sorensen; Jukka Takala; Kamen Valchanov; Michael Vallely Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Huaiwu He; Guillem Gruartmoner; Yilmaz Ince; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Bart F Geerts; Can Ince; Markus W Hollmann; Dawei Liu; Denise P Veelo Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.895