Literature DB >> 6841698

Signal, noise, and contrast in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging.

W A Edelstein, P A Bottomley, H R Hart, L S Smith.   

Abstract

Calculations of the sensitivity of the saturation recovery and inversion recovery pulse sequences used in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging show the former to be superior in discriminating between tissues with the same proton density but different T1's. Two other pulse sequences, which are combinations of the above, have also been analyzed. These have lower T1 discrimination sensitivity, but other considerations, such as self-normalization, may still make them attractive. The calculations are only valid for selective excitation pulse sequences in which the selected slice profiles are approximately rectangular, and thus a sin(bt)/t radiofrequency excitation is desirable. In order to ensure that the saturation recovery sequence gives valid results for pulse repetition times comparable to or shorter than T2, it is necessary to destroy the coherence between pulse applications. For this purpose we use a series of "spoiler" gradient pulses between pulse trains. The saturation recovery pulse sequence also has the advantage that, by the correct choice of interpulse spacing, sensitivity close to the optimum T1 discrimination can be achieved over a wide range of T1 values. This has the potential advantage to the clinician of simplifying his choice of parameters for imaging.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841698     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198306000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging. Sequence acronyms and other abbreviations in MR imaging].

Authors:  W R Nitz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Filter-based coded-excitation system for high-speed ultrasonic imaging.

Authors:  J Shen; E S Ebbini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  A model for MRI contrast enhancement using T1 agents.

Authors:  E T Ahrens; U Rothbächer; R E Jacobs; S E Fraser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Optimization of survey protocols for MRI.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; R M Henkelman; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MRI: time is dose--and money and versatility.

Authors:  William A Edelstein; Mahadevappa Mahesh; John A Carrino
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  High field resolution magnetic resonance imaging of malignant choroidal melanoma.

Authors:  L Lambrecht; R Allewaert; J J de Laey; H Verbraeken; J Bittoun; E van de Velde
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Optimization of MR protocols: a statistical decision analysis approach.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Vascular input function correction of inflow enhancement for improved pharmacokinetic modeling of liver DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Jia Ning; Tilman Schubert; Kevin M Johnson; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Huijun Chen; Chun Yuan; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Resistive NMR of intracranial hematomas.

Authors:  R A Zimmerman; L T Bilaniuk; R I Grossman; R S Levine; R Lynch; H I Goldberg; L Samuel; W Edelstein; P Bottomley; R W Redington
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Resistive NMR of brain stem gliomas.

Authors:  R A Zimmerman; L T Bilaniuk; R Packer; L Sutton; L Samuel; M H Johnson; R I Grossman; H I Goldberg
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.