Literature DB >> 28401643

Ultrafast compartmentalized relaxation time mapping with linear algebraic modeling.

Yi Zhang1, Xiaoyang Liu1,2, Jinyuan Zhou1,3, Paul A Bottomley1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To dramatically accelerate compartmental-average longitudinal (T1 ) and transverse (T2 ) relaxation measurements using the minimal-acquisition linear algebraic modeling (SLAM) method, and to validate it in phantoms and humans.
METHODS: Relaxation times were imaged at 3 Tesla in phantoms, in the abdomens of six volunteers, and in six brain tumor patients using standard inversion recovery and multi-spin-echo sequences. k-space was fully sampled to provide reference T1 and T2 measurements, and SLAM was performed using a limited set of phase encodes from central k-space. Anatomical compartments were segmented on scout images post-acquisition, and SLAM reconstruction was implemented using two algorithms. Compartment-average T1 and T2 measurements were determined retroactively from fully sampled data sets, and proactively from SLAM data sets at acceleration factors of up to 16. Values were compared with reference measurements. The compartment's localization properties were analyzed using the discrete spatial response function.
RESULTS: At 16-fold acceleration, compartment-average SLAM T1 measurements agreed with the full k-space compartment-average results to within 0.0% ± 0.7%, 1.4% ± 3.4%, and 0.5% ± 2.9% for phantom, abdominal, and brain T1 measurements, respectively. The corresponding T2 measurements agreed within 0.2% ± 1.9%, 0.9% ± 7.9%, and 0.4% ± 5.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: SLAM can dramatically accelerate relaxation time measurements when compartmental or lesion-average values can suffice, or when standard relaxometry is precluded by scan-time limitations. Magn Reson Med 79:286-297, 2018.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdomen, brain tumors; discrete spatial response function (dSRF); fast imaging; relaxation times (T1 and T2); spectroscopy with linear algebraic modeling (SLAM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28401643      PMCID: PMC5636648          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  52 in total

1.  k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) for contrast manipulation in projection reconstruction MRI.

Authors:  H K Song; L Dougherty
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  FLASH imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. 1986.

Authors:  A Haase; J Frahm; D Matthaei; W Hänicke; K-D Merboldt
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Hanzhang Lu; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Xavier Golay; Doris Lin; Martin Pomper; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Selective Fourier transform localization.

Authors:  H R Brooker; T H Mareci; J T Mao
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic?

Authors:  P A Bottomley; C J Hardy; R E Argersinger; G Allen-Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quantitative assessment of amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging with extrapolated semi-solid magnetization transfer reference (EMR) signals: Application to a rat glioma model at 4.7 Tesla.

Authors:  Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Dong-Hoon Lee; Xiaohua Hong; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Accelerating MR parameter mapping using sparsity-promoting regularization in parametric dimension.

Authors:  Julia V Velikina; Andrew L Alexander; Alexey Samsonov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Highly accelerated chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) measurements with linear algebraic modeling.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Hye-Young Heo; Shanshan Jiang; Dong-Hoon Lee; Paul A Bottomley; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Minimum acquisition methods for simultaneously imaging T(1), T(2), and proton density with B(1) correction and no spin-echoes.

Authors:  Guan Wang; AbdEl-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting.

Authors:  Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.

Authors:  Jinyuan Zhou; Moritz Zaiss; Linda Knutsson; Phillip Zhe Sun; Sung Soo Ahn; Silvio Aime; Peter Bachert; Jaishri O Blakeley; Kejia Cai; Michael A Chappell; Min Chen; Daniel F Gochberg; Steffen Goerke; Hye-Young Heo; Shanshan Jiang; Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim; John Laterra; Daniel Paech; Mark D Pagel; Ji Eun Park; Ravinder Reddy; Akihiko Sakata; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; A Dean Sherry; Seth A Smith; Greg J Stanisz; Pia C Sundgren; Osamu Togao; Moriel Vandsburger; Zhibo Wen; Yin Wu; Yi Zhang; Wenzhen Zhu; Zhongliang Zu; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  High-resolution and accelerated multi-parametric mapping with automated characterization of vessel disease using intravascular MRI.

Authors:  Guan Wang; Yi Zhang; Shashank Sathyanarayana Hegde; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 5.364

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.