PURPOSE: Low pH is associated with intervertebral disc (IVD)-generated low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this work was to develop an in vivo pH level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method for detecting discogenic LBP, without using exogenous contrast agents. METHODS: The ratio of R1ρ dispersion and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) (RROC) was used for pH-level dependent imaging of the IVD while eliminating the effect of labile proton concentration. The technique was validated by numerical simulations and studies on phantoms and ex vivo porcine spines. Four male (ages 42.8 ± 18.3) and two female patients (ages 55.5 ± 2.1) with LBP and scheduled for discography were examined with the method on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner. RROC measurements were compared with discography outcomes using paired t-test. RESULTS: Simulation and phantom results indicated RROC is a concentration independent and pH level-dependent technique. Porcine spine study results found higher RROC value was related to lower pH level. Painful discs based on discography had significant higher RROC values than those with negative diagnosis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: RROC imaging is a promising pH level dependent MRI technique that has the potential to be a noninvasive imaging tool to detect painful IVDs in vivo.
PURPOSE: Low pH is associated with intervertebral disc (IVD)-generated low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this work was to develop an in vivo pH level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method for detecting discogenic LBP, without using exogenous contrast agents. METHODS: The ratio of R1ρ dispersion and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) (RROC) was used for pH-level dependent imaging of the IVD while eliminating the effect of labile proton concentration. The technique was validated by numerical simulations and studies on phantoms and ex vivo porcine spines. Four male (ages 42.8 ± 18.3) and two female patients (ages 55.5 ± 2.1) with LBP and scheduled for discography were examined with the method on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner. RROC measurements were compared with discography outcomes using paired t-test. RESULTS: Simulation and phantom results indicated RROC is a concentration independent and pH level-dependent technique. Porcine spine study results found higher RROC value was related to lower pH level. Painful discs based on discography had significant higher RROC values than those with negative diagnosis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: RROC imaging is a promising pH level dependent MRI technique that has the potential to be a noninvasive imaging tool to detect painful IVDs in vivo.
Authors: Walter R T Witschey; Arijitt Borthakur; Mark A Elliott; Eric Mellon; Sampreet Niyogi; Daniel J Wallman; Chenyang Wang; Ravinder Reddy Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2007-01-26 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Jin Zuo; Gabby B Joseph; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Serena S Hu; Sigurd H Berven; John Kurhanewitz; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Zheng Liu; Ivan E Dimitrov; Robert E Lenkinski; Asghar Hajibeigi; Elena Vinogradov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jiadi Xu; Kannie W Y Chan; Xiang Xu; Nirbhay Yadav; Guanshu Liu; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiao-Yong Zhang; Feng Wang; Tao Jin; Junzhong Xu; Jingping Xie; Daniel F Gochberg; John C Gore; Zhongliang Zu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhengwei Zhou; Maxim Bez; Wafa Tawackoli; Joseph Giaconi; Dmitriy Sheyn; Sandra de Mel; Marcel M Maya; Barry D Pressman; Zulma Gazit; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lachlan J Smith; Lara Silverman; Daisuke Sakai; Christine L Le Maitre; Robert L Mauck; Neil R Malhotra; Jeffrey C Lotz; Conor T Buckley Journal: JOR Spine Date: 2018-10-08
Authors: Huanling Liu; Anna Jablonska; Yuguo Li; Suyi Cao; Dexiang Liu; Hanwei Chen; Peter Cm Van Zijl; Jeff W M Bulte; Miroslaw Janowski; Piotr Walczak; Guanshu Liu Journal: Theranostics Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 11.556