Literature DB >> 25641791

A review of optimization and quantification techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI toward sensitive in vivo imaging.

Jinsuh Kim1, Yin Wu2,3, Yingkun Guo3, Hairong Zheng2, Phillip Zhe Sun3.   

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a versatile imaging method that probes the chemical exchange between bulk water and exchangeable protons. CEST imaging indirectly detects dilute labile protons via bulk water signal changes following selective saturation of exchangeable protons, which offers substantial sensitivity enhancement and has sparked numerous biomedical applications. Over the past decade, CEST imaging techniques have rapidly evolved owing to contributions from multiple domains, including the development of CEST mathematical models, innovative contrast agent designs, sensitive data acquisition schemes, efficient field inhomogeneity correction algorithms, and quantitative CEST (qCEST) analysis. The CEST system that underlies the apparent CEST-weighted effect, however, is complex. The experimentally measurable CEST effect depends not only on parameters such as CEST agent concentration, pH and temperature, but also on relaxation rate, magnetic field strength and more importantly, experimental parameters including repetition time, RF irradiation amplitude and scheme, and image readout. Thorough understanding of the underlying CEST system using qCEST analysis may augment the diagnostic capability of conventional imaging. In this review, we provide a concise explanation of CEST acquisition methods and processing algorithms, including their advantages and limitations, for optimization and quantification of CEST MRI experiments.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; amide proton transfer; chemical exchange saturatio transfer; quantitative chemical exchange saturatio transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25641791      PMCID: PMC4469549          DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.1628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1555-4309            Impact factor:   3.161


  139 in total

1.  Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer using multiple selective pulses.

Authors:  D F Gochberg; R P Kennan; M D Robson; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Targeted PARACEST nanoparticle contrast agent for the detection of fibrin.

Authors:  Patrick M Winter; Kejia Cai; Junjie Chen; Christopher R Adair; Garry E Kiefer; Phillip S Athey; Patrick J Gaffney; Carolyn E Buff; J David Robertson; Shelton D Caruthers; Samuel A Wickline; Gregory M Lanza
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Magnetic field dependence of the distribution of NMR relaxation times in the living human brain.

Authors:  A M Oros-Peusquens; M Laurila; N J Shah
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Simultaneous in vivo pH and temperature mapping using a PARACEST-MRI contrast agent.

Authors:  Nevin McVicar; Alex X Li; Mojmír Suchý; Robert H E Hudson; Ravi S Menon; Robert Bartha
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Spin-locking versus chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI for investigating chemical exchange process between water and labile metabolite protons.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Joonas Autio; Takayuki Obata; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Assessment of ischemic penumbra in patients with hyperacute stroke using amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.

Authors:  Anna Tietze; Jakob Blicher; Irene Klaerke Mikkelsen; Leif Østergaard; Megan K Strother; Seth A Smith; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Quantification of iopamidol multi-site chemical exchange properties for ratiometric chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging of pH.

Authors:  Phillip Zhe Sun; Dario Livio Longo; Wei Hu; Gang Xiao; Renhua Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  APT-weighted and NOE-weighted image contrasts in glioma with different RF saturation powers based on magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry analyses.

Authors:  Jinyuan Zhou; Xiaohua Hong; Xuna Zhao; Jia-Hong Gao; Jing Yuan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  PARACEST MRI with improved temporal resolution.

Authors:  Guanshu Liu; M Meser Ali; Byunghee Yoo; Mark A Griswold; Jean A Tkach; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  A simple correction for B1 field errors in magnetization transfer ratio measurements.

Authors:  Rebecca S Samson; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Mark R Symms; Daniel J Tozer; Paul S Tofts
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  27 in total

1.  Approximated analytical characterization of the steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) signals.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quantitative pulsed CEST-MRI at a clinical 3T MRI system.

Authors:  Julia Stabinska; Tom Cronenberg; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Rotem Shlomo Lanzman; Anja Müller-Lutz
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Extracellular pH mapping of liver cancer on a clinical 3T MRI scanner.

Authors:  Daniel Coman; Dana C Peters; John J Walsh; Lynn J Savic; Steffen Huber; Albert J Sinusas; MingDe Lin; Julius Chapiro; R Todd Constable; Douglas L Rothman; James S Duncan; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Interrogating Metabolism in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Travis C Salzillo; Jingzhe Hu; Linda Nguyen; Nicholas Whiting; Jaehyuk Lee; Joseph Weygand; Prasanta Dutta; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Niki Zacharias Millward; Seth T Gammon; Frederick F Lang; Amy B Heimberger; Pratip K Bhattacharya
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Mapping tissue pH in an experimental model of acute stroke - Determination of graded regional tissue pH changes with non-invasive quantitative amide proton transfer MRI.

Authors:  Enfeng Wang; Yin Wu; Jerry S Cheung; Takahiro Igarashi; Limin Wu; Xiaoan Zhang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Quantitative description of radiofrequency (RF) power-based ratiometric chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) pH imaging.

Authors:  Renhua Wu; Dario Livio Longo; Silvio Aime; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  Clinical applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.

Authors:  Kyle M Jones; Alyssa C Pollard; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Amide proton transfer imaging seems to provide higher diagnostic performance in post-treatment high-grade gliomas than methionine positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Ji Ye Lee; Ho Sung Kim; Joo-Young Oh; Seung Chai Jung; Sang Joon Kim; Jochen Keupp; Minyoung Oh; Jae Seung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Molecular Imaging of Extracellular Tumor pH to Reveal Effects of Locoregional Therapy on Liver Cancer Microenvironment.

Authors:  Daniel Coman; Julius Chapiro; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Isabel Theresa Schobert; Dana Peters; John J Walsh; Fabian Max Laage-Gaupp; Charlie Alexander Hamm; Nina Tritz; Luzie A Doemel; MingDe Lin; Albert Sinusas; Todd Schlachter; James S Duncan; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Investigating the origin of pH-sensitive magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry MRI contrast during the acute stroke: Correction of T1 change reveals the dominant amide proton transfer MRI signal.

Authors:  Limin Wu; Liang Jiang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.