PURPOSE: To develop a robust sequence that combines T1ρ and T2 quantifications and to examine the in vivo repeatability and diurnal variation of T1ρ and T2 quantifications in knee cartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six healthy volunteers were scanned in the morning and afternoon on 2 days using a combined T1ρ and T2 quantification sequence developed in this study. Repeatability of T1ρ and T2 quantification was estimated using root-mean-square coefficients-of-variation (RMS-CV). T1ρ and T2 values from morning scans were compared to those from afternoon scans using paired t-tests. RESULTS: The overall RMS-CV of in vivo T1ρ and T2 quantification was 5.3% and 5.2%, respectively. The RMS-CV of am scans was 4.2% and 5.0% while the RMS-CV of pm scans was 6.0% and 6.3% for T1ρ and T2 , respectively. No significant difference was found between T1ρ or T2 values in the morning and in the afternoon. CONCLUSION: A sequence that combines T1ρ and T2 quantification with scan time less than 10 minutes and is robust to B0 and B1 inhomogeneity was developed with excellent repeatability. For a cohort with low-level daily activity, although no significant diurnal variation of cartilage MR relaxation times was observed, the afternoon scans had inferior repeatability compared to morning scans.
PURPOSE: To develop a robust sequence that combines T1ρ and T2 quantifications and to examine the in vivo repeatability and diurnal variation of T1ρ and T2 quantifications in knee cartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six healthy volunteers were scanned in the morning and afternoon on 2 days using a combined T1ρ and T2 quantification sequence developed in this study. Repeatability of T1ρ and T2 quantification was estimated using root-mean-square coefficients-of-variation (RMS-CV). T1ρ and T2 values from morning scans were compared to those from afternoon scans using paired t-tests. RESULTS: The overall RMS-CV of in vivo T1ρ and T2 quantification was 5.3% and 5.2%, respectively. The RMS-CV of am scans was 4.2% and 5.0% while the RMS-CV of pm scans was 6.0% and 6.3% for T1ρ and T2 , respectively. No significant difference was found between T1ρ or T2 values in the morning and in the afternoon. CONCLUSION: A sequence that combines T1ρ and T2 quantification with scan time less than 10 minutes and is robust to B0 and B1 inhomogeneity was developed with excellent repeatability. For a cohort with low-level daily activity, although no significant diurnal variation of cartilage MR relaxation times was observed, the afternoon scans had inferior repeatability compared to morning scans.
Authors: Xiaojuan Li; Eric T Han; C Benjamin Ma; Thomas M Link; David C Newitt; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: J C Waterton; S Solloway; J E Foster; M C Keen; S Gandy; B J Middleton; R A Maciewicz; I Watt; P A Dieppe; C J Taylor Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: X Li; C Benjamin Ma; T M Link; D-D Castillo; G Blumenkrantz; J Lozano; J Carballido-Gamio; M Ries; S Majumdar Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Robert Stahl; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Musa Zaid; Drew Lansdown; Favian Su; Valentina Pedoia; Lauren Tufts; Sarah Rizzo; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Michael A Samaan; Alan L Zhang; Tijana Popovic; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza Journal: J Biomech Date: 2018-12-23 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Kevin A Taylor; Amber T Collins; Lauren N Heckelman; Sophia Y Kim; Gangadhar M Utturkar; Charles E Spritzer; William E Garrett; Louis E DeFrate Journal: J Biomech Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Michael A Samaan; Alan L Zhang; Matthew C Gallo; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Thomas M Link; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 4.813