Literature DB >> 24687378

MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.

D Gareth Evans, Evans D Gareth1, Nisha Kesavan, Kesavan Nisha, Yit Lim, Lim Yit, Soujanye Gadde, Gadde Soujanye, Emma Hurley, Hurley Emma, Nathalie J Massat, Anthony J Maxwell, Sarah Ingham, Ingham Sarah, Rosalind Eeles, Eeles Rosalind, Martin O Leach, Anthony Howell, Howell Anthony, Stephen W Duffy, Duffy Stephen.   

Abstract

Women with a genetic predisposition to breast cancer tend to develop the disease at a younger age with denser breasts making mammography screening less effective. The introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for familial breast cancer screening programs in recent years was intended to improve outcomes in these women. We aimed to assess whether introduction of MRI surveillance improves 5- and 10-year survival of high-risk women and determine the accuracy of MRI breast cancer detection compared with mammography-only or no enhanced surveillance and compare size and pathology of cancers detected in women screened with MRI + mammography and mammography only. We used data from two prospective studies where asymptomatic women with a very high breast cancer risk were screened by either mammography alone or with MRI also compared with BRCA1/2 carriers with no intensive surveillance. 63 cancers were detected in women receiving MRI + mammography and 76 in women receiving mammography only. Sensitivity of MRI + mammography was 93 % with 63 % specificity. Fewer cancers detected on MRI were lymph node positive compared to mammography/no additional screening. There were no differences in 10-year survival between the MRI + mammography and mammography-only groups, but survival was significantly higher in the MRI-screened group (95.3 %) compared to no intensive screening (73.7 %; p = 0.002). There were no deaths among the 21 BRCA2 carriers receiving MRI. There appears to be benefit from screening with MRI, particularly in BRCA2 carriers. Extended follow-up of larger numbers of high-risk women is required to assess long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687378     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2931-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  34 in total

Review 1.  Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Clare Turnbull
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  D Lin; L Moy; D Axelrod; J Smith
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Magnetic resonance molecular imaging of metastatic breast cancer by targeting extradomain-B fibronectin in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Zheng Han; Han Cheng; Jenny G Parvani; Zhuxian Zhou; Zheng-Rong Lu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meagan Brennan; Brooke Nickel; Shuangqin Huang; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Intensified surveillance for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Global Disparities in Breast Cancer Genetics Testing, Counselling and Management.

Authors:  C H Yip; D G Evans; G Agarwal; I Buccimazza; A Kwong; R Morant; I Prakash; C Y Song; N A Taib; C Tausch; O Ung; S Meterissian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Sarah Stamler; Jennifer Brooks; Jennifer Kaplan; Tammy Huang; D David Dershaw; Carol H Lee; Elizabeth A Morris; Christopher E Comstock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Primary Care Provider Experience with Breast Density Legislation in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Nancy R Kressin; Kristina Cooper; Cinthya Marturano; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Survival Outcomes of Screening with Breast MRI in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; Janice S Sung; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Elizabeth J Sutton; Christopher E Comstock; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2020-01-15

10.  Association of Retrospective Peer Review and Positive Predictive Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Needle Biopsies of Breast.

Authors:  Ceren Yalnız; Juliana Rosenblat; David Spak; Wei Wei; Marion Scoggins; Carisa Le-Petross; Mark J Dryden; Beatriz Adrada; Başak E Doğan
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.