Literature DB >> 32055796

Survival Outcomes of Screening with Breast MRI in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer.

Min Sun Bae1, Janice S Sung1, Blanca Bernard-Davila1, Elizabeth J Sutton1, Christopher E Comstock1, Elizabeth A Morris1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine survival outcomes in women with breast cancer detected at combined screening with breast MRI and mammography versus screening mammography alone.
METHODS: This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective study, and the need for informed consent was waived. A total of 3002 women with an increased risk of breast cancer were screened between 2001 and 2004. Of the 3002 women, 1534 (51.1%) had 2780 combined screenings (MRI and mammography) and 1468 (48.9%) had 4811 mammography-only screenings. The Χ 2 test and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare cancer detection rates and survival rates.
RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rate was significantly higher in the MRI plus mammography group compared with the mammography-only group (1.4% [40 of 2780] vs 0.5% [23 of 4811]; P < 0.001). No interval cancers occurred in the MRI plus mammography group, whereas 9 interval cancers were found in the mammography-only group. During a median follow-up of 10.9 years (range: 0.7 to 15.2), a total of 11 recurrences and 5 deaths occurred. Of the 11 recurrences, 6 were in the MRI plus mammography group and 5 were in the mammography-only group. All five deaths occurred in the mammography-only group. Disease-free survival showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.32). However, overall survival was significantly improved in the MRI plus mammography group (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Combined screening with MRI and mammography in women at elevated risk of breast cancer improves cancer detection and overall survival. © Society of Breast Imaging 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; mammography; screening; survival breast cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32055796      PMCID: PMC6999769          DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbz083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Imaging        ISSN: 2631-6110


  32 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Kevin Strobel; Heribert Bieling; Claudia Leutner; Hans H Schild; Simone Schrading
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Susan P Weinstein; A Russell Localio; Emily F Conant; Mark Rosen; Kathleen M Thomas; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Screening MRI in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Janie M Lee; Wendy B DeMartini; Daniel S Hippe; Mara H Rendi; Grace Kalish; Peggy Porter; Julie Gralow; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Christiane K Kuhl; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers.

Authors:  Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Lena U Rosenberg; Sven Törnberg; Keith Humphreys; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Addressing Disparities Related to Access of Multimodality Breast Imaging Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Derek L Nguyen; Emily B Ambinder; Kelly S Myers; Eniola Oluyemi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  The WISDOM study: a new approach to screening can and should be tested.

Authors:  Laura Esserman; Martin Eklund; Laura Van't Veer; Yiwey Shieh; Jeffrey Tice; Elad Ziv; Amie Blanco; Celia Kaplan; Robert Hiatt; Allison Stover Fiscalini; Christina Yau; Maren Scheuner; Arash Naeim; Neil Wenger; Vivian Lee; Diane Heditsian; Susie Brain; Barbara A Parker; Andrea Z LaCroix; Lisa Madlensky; Michael Hogarth; Alexander Borowsky; Hoda Anton-Culver; Andrea Kaster; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Deepa Sheth; Augustin Garcia; Rachael Lancaster; Michael Plaza
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Association of Population Screening for Breast Cancer Risk With Use of Mammography Among Women in Medically Underserved Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups.

Authors:  Candice Schwartz; Ifeanyi Beverly Chukwudozie; Silvia Tejeda; Ganga Vijayasiri; Ivy Abraham; Mylene Remo; Hiral A Shah; Maria Rojas; Alicia Carillo; Loraine Moreno; Richard B Warnecke; Kent F Hoskins
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.