Literature DB >> 26628872

Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.

D Lin1, L Moy1, D Axelrod1, J Smith1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID： 26628872      PMCID： PMC4608405          DOI： 10.3747/co.22.2882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN： 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


× No keyword cloud information.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Ellen Warner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced screening breast MRI in populations at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer Gillman; Hildegard K Toth; Linda Moy
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2014-11

3.  Abbreviated screening protocol for breast MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Mary S Soo; Sora Yoon; Connie Kim; Sujata V Ghate; Karen S Johnson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Survival benefit in women with BRCA1 mutation or familial risk in the MRI screening study (MRISC).

Authors:  Sepideh Saadatmand; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Emiel J Rutgers; Jan C Oosterwijk; Rob A Tollenaar; Gwendolyn H Woldringh; Elisabeth Bergers; Cornelis Verhoef; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Maartje J Hooning; Harry J de Koning; Madeleine M Tilanus-Linthorst
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  MR dynamic enhancement of breast lesions: high temporal resolution during the first-minute versus eight-minute study.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; G Rescinito; G D Giordano; M Calabrese; R C Parodi
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.

Authors:  Christopher C Riedl; Nikolaus Luft; Clemens Bernhart; Michael Weber; Maria Bernathova; Muy-Kheng M Tea; Margaretha Rudas; Christian F Singer; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the ontario high risk breast screening program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Maegan V Prummel; Derek Muradali; Vicky Majpruz; Meaghan Horgan; June C Carroll; Andrea Eisen; Wendy S Meschino; Rene S Shumak; Ellen Warner; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A novel approach to contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging for screening: high-resolution ultrafast dynamic imaging.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Roel D Mus; Jan van Zelst; Christian Geppert; Nico Karssemeijer; Bram Platel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 10.  Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women's information.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Ulrich Bick; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Andrew Evans; Eva Fallenberg; Gabor Forrai; Michael H Fuchsjäger; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Julia Camps-Herrero; Christiane K Kuhl; Laura Martincich; Federica Pediconi; Pietro Panizza; Luis J Pina; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Per Skaane; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315
View more
  2 in total

1.  The mammography debate, round two: science, smoke and mirrors.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  The mammography debate: the senior years.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.677
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.