Literature DB >> 33774734

The impact of mandatory mammographic breast density notification on supplemental screening practice in the United States: a systematic review.

Meagan Brennan1,2, Brooke Nickel3, Shuangqin Huang3, Nehmat Houssami3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dense breast tissue is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and lowers the sensitivity of screening mammography. Supplemental screening with ultrasound or MRI improves breast cancer detection rate but has potential harms. Breast density notification (BDN) legislation has been introduced in the United States (US) and its impact on supplemental screening practice is unclear. This study systematically reviewed current evidence to explore the impact of BDN on supplemental screening practice in the US.
METHODS: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and the Cinhal Library databases were searched (2009-August 2020). Studies were assessed for eligibility, data were extracted and summarised, and study quality was evaluated.
RESULTS: Evidence from the included studies (n = 14) predominantly showed that BDN legislation increased the overall utilisation of supplemental screening by 0.5-143%. This effect was amplified if the notification included a follow-up telephone call informing women about additional screening benefits, and if the state's law mandated insurance cover for supplemental screening. Likelihood of supplemental screening was also influenced by history of breast biopsy and family history of breast cancer, race, age, socioeconomic status, density category, and physician's specialty and region. Some studies reported increases in biopsy rate (up to 4%) and cancer detection rate (up to 11%) after implementation of BDN legislation.
CONCLUSION: BDN leads to increased use of supplemental screening. This has implications for women and the health system. These findings can help inform current and future screening programs, where breast density notification is currently implemented or being considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast density; Legislation; Mammography; Notification; Supplemental screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33774734     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06203-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  39 in total

1.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano; Richard G Barr; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Mary C Mahoney; W Phil Evans; Linda H Larsen; Marilyn J Morton; Ellen B Mendelson; Dione M Farria; Jean B Cormack; Helga S Marques; Amanda Adams; Nolin M Yeh; Glenna Gabrielli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-specific US breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Diego Munoz; Aimee M Near; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Donald A Berry; Elizabeth S Burnside; Yaojen Chang; Gary Chisholm; Harry J de Koning; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Hui Huang; Natasha K Stout; Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Kevin Strobel; Heribert Bieling; Claudia Leutner; Hans H Schild; Simone Schrading
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.

Authors:  Phoebe E Freer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  The Impact of Breast Density Reporting Laws on Women's Awareness of Density-Associated Risks and Conversations Regarding Supplemental Screening With Providers.

Authors:  Nancy M Cappello; Dorinda Richetelli; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Breast density implications and supplemental screening.

Authors:  Athina Vourtsis; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; Evans D Gareth; Nisha Kesavan; Kesavan Nisha; Yit Lim; Lim Yit; Soujanye Gadde; Gadde Soujanye; Emma Hurley; Hurley Emma; Nathalie J Massat; Anthony J Maxwell; Sarah Ingham; Ingham Sarah; Rosalind Eeles; Eeles Rosalind; Martin O Leach; Anthony Howell; Howell Anthony; Stephen W Duffy; Duffy Stephen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  2 in total

1.  Australian Women's Intentions and Psychological Outcomes Related to Breast Density Notification and Information: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hankiz Dolan; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami; Erin Cvejic; Meagan Brennan; Jolyn Hersch; Melanie Dorrington; Angela Verde; Lisa Vaccaro; Brooke Nickel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  Estimation of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis in a U.S. Breast Screening Cohort.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Jane Lange; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Ellen S O'Meara; Charlotte Gard; Diana L Miglioretti; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Andrew F Brouwer; E Shelley Hwang; Ruth B Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 51.598

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.