Literature DB >> 26483301

Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes.

William D Foulkes1,2, Bartha Maria Knoppers1,3, Clare Turnbull4,5.   

Abstract

The current standard model for identifying carriers of high-risk mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes (CSGs) generally involves a process that is not amenable to population-based testing: access to genetic tests is typically regulated by health-care providers on the basis of a labour-intensive assessment of an individual's personal and family history of cancer, with face-to-face genetic counselling performed before mutation testing. Several studies have shown that application of these selection criteria results in a substantial proportion of mutation carriers being missed. Population-based genetic testing has been proposed as an alternative approach to determining cancer susceptibility, and aims for a more-comprehensive detection of mutation carriers. Herein, we review the existing data on population-based genetic testing, and consider some of the barriers, pitfalls, and challenges related to the possible expansion of this approach. We consider mechanisms by which population-based genetic testing for cancer susceptibility could be delivered, and suggest how such genetic testing might be integrated into existing and emerging health-care structures. The existing models of genetic testing (including issues relating to informed consent) will very likely require considerable alteration if the potential benefits of population-based genetic testing are to be fully realized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26483301     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  71 in total

1.  Application of population screening principles to genetic screening for adult-onset conditions.

Authors:  W Burke; S S Coughlin; N C Lee; D L Weed; M J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2001

Review 2.  The impact of next generation sequencing on the analysis of breast cancer susceptibility: a role for extremely rare genetic variation?

Authors:  F S M Hilbers; M P G Vreeswijk; C J van Asperen; P Devilee
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sylvia K Plevritis; Allison W Kurian; Bronislava M Sigal; Bruce L Daniel; Debra M Ikeda; Frank E Stockdale; Alan M Garber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.

Authors:  Cristina O'Donoghue; Martin Eklund; Elissa M Ozanne; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Amnon Lahad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Long-term follow-up of Jewish women with a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation who underwent population genetic screening.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Nida Mian; Melissa Enmore; Aletta Poll; Marcia Llacuachaqui; Sonia Nanda; Ping Sun; Kevin S Hughes; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Oral contraceptives and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group.

Authors:  S A Narod; H Risch; R Moslehi; A Dørum; S Neuhausen; H Olsson; D Provencher; P Radice; G Evans; S Bishop; J S Brunet; B A Ponder
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Efrat Gabai-Kapara; Amnon Lahad; Bella Kaufman; Eitan Friedman; Shlomo Segev; Paul Renbaum; Rachel Beeri; Moran Gal; Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Karen Djemal; Jessica B Mandell; Ming K Lee; Uziel Beller; Raphael Catane; Mary-Claire King; Ephrat Levy-Lahad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A comparison of the detection of BRCA mutation carriers through the provision of Jewish population-based genetic testing compared with clinic-based genetic testing.

Authors:  K A Metcalfe; A Poll; R Royer; S Nanda; M Llacuachaqui; P Sun; S A Narod
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Holistic cancer genome profiling for every patient.

Authors:  Serena Nik-Zainal; Yasin Memari; Helen R Davies
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 2.  Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-risk Women.

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Jennifer Bergstrom; Goli Samimi; Lori Minasian
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Recommendations on breast cancer screening and prevention in the context of implementing risk stratification: impending changes to current policies.

Authors:  J Gagnon; E Lévesque; F Borduas; J Chiquette; C Diorio; N Duchesne; M Dumais; L Eloy; W Foulkes; N Gervais; L Lalonde; B L'Espérance; S Meterissian; L Provencher; J Richard; C Savard; I Trop; N Wong; B M Knoppers; J Simard
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Analysis of BRCA1/2 mutation spectrum and prevalence in unselected Chinese breast cancer patients by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Guoli Li; Xinwu Guo; Lili Tang; Ming Chen; Xipeng Luo; Limin Peng; Xunxun Xu; Shouman Wang; Zhi Xiao; Wenjun Yi; Lizhong Dai; Jun Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may aid in identifying patients with non-small cell lung cancer and predicting Tumor-Node-Metastasis stages.

Authors:  Fei Xu; Pengliang Xu; Wenqiang Cui; Weiyi Gong; Ying Wei; Baojun Liu; Jingcheng Dong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Towards precision nephrology: the opportunities and challenges of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jordan G Nestor; Emily E Groopman; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 7.  Reconciling Opportunistic and Population Screening in Clinical Genomics.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Jason L Vassy; Robert C Green
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Mutation Spectrum of STAR and a Founder Effect of the p.Q258* in Korean Patients with Congenital Lipoid Adrenal Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Eungu Kang; Yoon-Myung Kim; Gu-Hwan Kim; Beom Hee Lee; Han-Wook Yoo; Jin-Ho Choi
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.354

9.  Ultraspecific analyte detection by direct kinetic fingerprinting of single molecules.

Authors:  Tanmay Chatterjee; Zi Li; Kunal Khanna; Karen Montoya; Muneesh Tewari; Nils G Walter; Alexander Johnson-Buck
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 12.296

Review 10.  The role of genomics in global cancer prevention.

Authors:  Ophira Ginsburg; Paul Brennan; Patricia Ashton-Prolla; Anna Cantor; Daniela Mariosa
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.