Literature DB >> 29338539

Primary Care Provider Experience with Breast Density Legislation in Massachusetts.

Christine M Gunn1,2, Nancy R Kressin1,3, Kristina Cooper1, Cinthya Marturano4, Karen M Freund4,5, Tracy A Battaglia1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dense breasts on mammography independently increases breast cancer risk and decreases mammography sensitivity. Thirty-two states have adopted notification laws to raise awareness among women with dense breasts about supplemental screening. Little is known about these policies' impact on clinical practice among primary care providers (PCPs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study explores PCP attitudes, knowledge, and the impact of the Massachusetts dense breast notification legislation on clinical practice after its enactment in 2015. An anonymous, online survey at two urban safety-net hospitals was administered in 2015-2016. Practicing MDs and nurse practitioners in primary care were invited to participate.
RESULTS: All 145 PCPs in general internal medicine at the two sites were e-mailed a survey link and 80 (55%) were completed. While 64 of 80 PCPs surveyed (80%) had some familiarity with the legislation, none identified the 8 required components of notifications contained in the Massachusetts legislation. Forty-nine percent (39/80) did not feel prepared to respond to patient questions about dense breasts. Forty-one percent (33/80) correctly identified that no current guidelines recommend the use of supplemental screening tests solely based on breast density and 85% (68/80) indicated interest in further training. Female and less experienced providers were more likely to be in favor of the legislation (49% vs. 11% by gender; 76% <5 years vs. 9%> 20 years). Women practitioners (55%) who were more likely than men (17%, p = 0.01) to agree with the policy changed their discussions of mammography results with patients.
CONCLUSIONS: PCPs feel underprepared to counsel women about breast density identified on mammography and its implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer screening; breast density; health policy; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29338539      PMCID: PMC7061298          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  47 in total

1.  Breast-density legislation--practical considerations.

Authors:  Priscilla J Slanetz; Phoebe E Freer; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel.

Authors:  Phoebe E Freer; Priscilla J Slanetz; Jennifer S Haas; Nadine M Tung; Kevin S Hughes; Katrina Armstrong; A Alan Semine; Susan L Troyan; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Breast density legislation. Implications for patients and primary care providers.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Amy Lynn Conners
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2014-07

Review 4.  Breast density legislation: mandatory disclosure to patients, alternative screening, billing, reimbursement.

Authors:  Kimberly M Ray; Elissa R Price; Bonnie N Joe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458.

Authors:  Tchaiko Parris; Dorothy Wakefield; Heather Frimmer
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 6.  Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.

Authors:  Jessica M Ho; Nasima Jafferjee; Gabriel M Covarrubias; Munir Ghesani; Bradley Handler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ellen P McCarthy; Russell S Phillips; Risa B Burns
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007-11-26

8.  Impact of Breast Density Legislation on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Supplemental Screening: A Survey of 110 Radiology Facilities.

Authors:  Lina Nayak; Kanae K Miyake; Jessica W T Leung; Elissa R Price; Yueyi I Liu; Bonnie N Joe; Edward A Sickles; William R Thomas; Jafi A Lipson; Bruce L Daniel; Jonathan Hargreaves; R James Brenner; Lawrence W Bassett; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Karen K Lindfors; Stephen A Feig; Debra M Ikeda
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ruth Etzioni; Abbe Herzig; James S Michaelson; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Samuel J LaMonte; Andrew M D Wolf; Carol DeSantis; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Kimberly Andrews; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Robert A Smith; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Assessing and managing breast cancer risk: clinicians' current practice and future needs.

Authors:  Ian M Collins; Emma Steel; G Bruce Mann; Jon D Emery; Adrian Bickerstaffe; Alison Trainer; Phyllis Butow; Marie Pirotta; Antonis C Antoniou; Jack Cuzick; John Hopper; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Louise A Keogh
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  11 in total

1.  "You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.

Authors:  Alsacia L Pacsi-Sepulveda; Rachel C Shelton; Carmen B Rodriguez; Arielle T Coq; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Acceptability of an Interactive Computer-Animated Agent to Promote Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density: a Mixed Method Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christine Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Timothy Bickmore; Mark Kennedy; Margaret F Hopkins; Michael D C Fishman; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Erica T Warner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Breast Density.

Authors:  Jordonna Brown; Chloe Soukas; Jenny J Lin; Laurie Margolies; Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Evaluating educational interventions to increase breast density awareness among Latinas: A randomized trial in a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ridgeway; Sarah M Jenkins; Bijan J Borah; Vera J Suman; Bhavika K Patel; Karthik Ghosh; Deborah J Rhodes; Aaron Norman; Edna P Ramos; Matt Jewett; Crystal R Gonzalez; Valentina Hernandez; Davinder Singh; Miranda Sosa; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Between-Race Differences in Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Before and After Breast Density Notification Law.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Suzanne O'Neill; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of "Informed".

Authors:  Karen E Schifferdecker; Anna N A Tosteson; Celia Kaplan; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Louise M Henderson; Dianne Johnson; Jill Jaworski; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Kelly Ehrlich; Mary W Marsh; Lisa Vu; Tracy Onega; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The Impact of Breast Density Information or Notification on Women's Cognitive, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Tessa Copp; Meagan Brennan; Rachel Farber; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The effect of breast density on the missed lesion rate in screening digital mammography determined using an adjustable-density breast phantom tailored to Japanese women.

Authors:  Mika Yamamuro; Yoshiyuki Asai; Naomi Hashimoto; Nao Yasuda; Yoshiaki Ozaki; Kazunari Ishii; Yongbum Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Understanding the response of mammography facilities to breast density notification.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Mary W Marsh; Kathryn Earnhardt; Michael Pritchard; Thad S Benefield; Robert P Agans; Sheila S Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast cancer supplemental screening: Women's knowledge and utilization in the era of dense breast legislation.

Authors:  Jenerius A Aminawung; Jessica R Hoag; Kelly A Kyanko; Xiao Xu; Ilana B Richman; Susan H Busch; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.