Literature DB >> 12520696

Clinical usefulness of components of the Triage immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B, and cytotoxin B tissue culture assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile diarrhea.

Viki Massey1, Daniel B Gregson, Abdul H Chagla, Miriam Storey, Michael A John, Zafar Hussain.   

Abstract

We studied 557 nonduplicate fresh stool specimens from adult patients clinically suspected of having Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. All samples were tested in parallel with an in-house cytotoxin B tissue culture assay (CTA), the C DIFFICILE TOX A/B II test (TA/B; TechLab, Blacksburg, VA), and the Triage Micro C DIFFICILE Panel (Biosite Diagnostics, San Diego, CA). The Triage device detects toxin A (TA) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) simultaneously. Of the specimens, 350 were negative and 95 were positive for all markers. Another 112 specimens yielded discrepant results. The CTA found 143 positive specimens. Results of the components of the Triage and TA/B were compared separately with those of CTA. GDH was the most sensitive but least specific marker, whereas TA and TA/B were less sensitive but highly specific. Because of these attributes and a quick turnaround time, GDH would be the best screening test for C difficile-associated diarrhea. CTA detected the highest number of cases of C difficile-associated diarrhea and would be most useful as a confirmatory test for GDH-positive and TA-negative specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12520696     DOI: 10.1309/U8AT-L52Q-60XY-AVX6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  15 in total

1.  Laboratory testing considerations for C. difficile disease.

Authors:  David F Welch
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-01

2.  Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.

Authors:  John R Ticehurst; Deborah Z Aird; Lisa M Dam; Anita P Borek; John T Hargrove; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin: comparison of enzyme immunoassay results with results obtained by cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Daniel M Musher; Atisha Manhas; Pranav Jain; Franziska Nuila; Amna Waqar; Nancy Logan; Bernard Marino; Edward A Graviss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Combination of culture, antigen and toxin detection, and cytotoxin neutralization assay for optimal Clostridium difficile diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Shadi Sepehri
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens.

Authors:  H Rüssmann; K Panthel; R-C Bader; C Schmitt; R Schaumann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

7.  Multicenter evaluation of the Quidel Lyra Direct C. difficile nucleic acid amplification assay.

Authors:  Eric T Beck; Blake W Buchan; Katherine M Riebe; Brenda R Alkins; Preeti Pancholi; Paul A Granato; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Heather Snell; Meredith Ramos; Sue Longo; Michael John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of repeat Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay testing.

Authors:  Diana M Cardona; Kenneth H Rand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.