Literature DB >> 19846637

Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.

Paul D Stamper1, Wisal Babiker, Romina Alcabasa, Deborah Aird, Jennifer Wehrlin, Ijeoma Ikpeama, Linda Gluck, Karen C Carroll.   

Abstract

The ProGastro Cd assay (Prodesse, Inc., Waukesha, WI) is a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay that detects tcdB. The ProGastro Cd assay was compared to the Wampole Clostridium difficile toxin B test (TOX-B test; TechLab, Blacksburg, VA), a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCCNA), and to anaerobic toxigenic bacterial culture, as the "gold standard," for 285 clinical stool specimens. Assays were independently performed according to manufacturers' directions. A 1.0-ml sample was removed from the stool specimen, of which 20 microl was used for extraction on the NucliSENS easyMAG platform (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC) for the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay and 200 microl of the stool filtrate was used for the TOX-B CCCNA. Anaerobic toxigenic culture was done by heating an additional 1.0 ml of the stool sample to 80 degrees C for 10 min before inoculation onto modified cycloserine, cefoxitin, and fructose agar with horse blood (Remel, Lenexa, KS) and into a prereduced chopped meat glucose broth (BBL, BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD). The prevalence of toxin-producing strains of C. difficile was 15.7% (n = 44) as determined by anaerobic toxigenic culture. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay compared to the TOX-B test were 83.3%, 95.6%, 69.4%, and 98%, respectively. Compared to toxigenic culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay were 77.3%, 99.2%, 94.4%, and 95.9%, respectively, and those of the TOX-B test were 63.6%, 99.2%, 93.3%, and 93.6%, respectively. Although no statistical difference (Fisher's exact test) was detected (P = 0.242) between the sensitivities of the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay and a standard CCCNA compared to anaerobic culture for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile, the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay did detect more toxigenic C. difficile isolates than the CCCNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846637      PMCID: PMC2786685          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01490-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  Prospective multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay and real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Renate J van den Berg; Lesla S Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet; Hendrik-Jan Gerritsen; Hubert P Endtz; Eric R van der Vorm; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Vivian G Loo; Louise Poirier; Mark A Miller; Matthew Oughton; Michael D Libman; Sophie Michaud; Anne-Marie Bourgault; Tuyen Nguyen; Charles Frenette; Mirabelle Kelly; Anne Vibien; Paul Brassard; Susan Fenn; Ken Dewar; Thomas J Hudson; Ruth Horn; Pierre René; Yury Monczak; André Dascal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; George E Killgore; Angela Thompson; Robert C Owens; Sophia V Kazakova; Susan P Sambol; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  "Second-look" cytotoxicity: an evaluation of culture plus cytotoxin assay of Clostridium difficile isolates in the laboratory diagnosis of CDAD.

Authors:  E Bouza; T Peláez; R Alonso; P Catalán; P Muñoz; M R Créixems
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Rapid detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in diarrheal stools by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Frédéric Barbut; Mylena Braun; Béatrice Burghoffer; Valérie Lalande; Catherine Eckert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of six commercial assays for the rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxin and/or antigen in stool specimens.

Authors:  H Vanpoucke; T De Baere; G Claeys; M Vaneechoutte; G Verschraegen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 7.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture.

Authors:  Michel Delmée; Johan Van Broeck; Anne Simon; Michèle Janssens; Véronique Avesani
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Production of a complete binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase) by Clostridium difficile CD196.

Authors:  S Perelle; M Gibert; P Bourlioux; G Corthier; M R Popoff
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in feces by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Simon D Bélanger; Maurice Boissinot; Natalie Clairoux; François J Picard; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Heather Snell; Meredith Ramos; Sue Longo; Michael John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  25 in total

1.  A multiplex, internally controlled real-time PCR assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and identification of hypervirulent strain 027/ST-1.

Authors:  A M Hoegh; J B Nielsen; A Lester; A Friis-Møller; K Schønning
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Perirectal swab surveillance for Clostridium difficile by use of selective broth preamplification and real-time PCR detection of tcdB.

Authors:  Scott R Curry; Jessica L Schlackman; Travis M Hamilton; Tatianna K Henderson; Nakita T Brown; Jane W Marsh; Kathleen A Shutt; Maria M Brooks; A William Pasculle; Carlene A Muto; Lee H Harrison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  The Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy Scripts: Updates on Clostridium difficile Infection: Advances in Laboratory Testing to Aid Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Louis Lteif
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2017-02

6.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.

Authors:  Bo-Moon Shin; Se Jin Mun; Soo Jin Yoo; Eun Young Kuak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by multiplex real-time PCR.

Authors:  F Barbut; M Monot; A Rousseau; S Cavelot; T Simon; B Burghoffer; V Lalande; J Tankovic; J-C Petit; B Dupuy; C Eckert
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

9.  Is repeat PCR needed for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Robert F Luo; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  tcdA As a diagnostic target in a loop-mediated amplification assay for detecting toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Brianne Couturier; Robert Schlaberg; Chris Konzak; Jeff Nicholes; Christian Law; Rosemary C She
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.