PURPOSE: To develop a fast and accurate monoexponential fitting algorithm based on Auto-Regression on Linear Operations (ARLO) of data, and to validate its accuracy and computational speed by comparing it with the conventional Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Log-Linear (LL) algorithms. METHODS: ARLO, LM, and LL performances for T2* mapping were evaluated in simulation and in vivo imaging of liver (n=15) and myocardial (n=1) iron overload patients and the brain (two healthy volunteers). RESULTS: In simulations, ARLO consistently delivered accuracy similar to LM and significantly superior to LL. In in vivo mapping of T2 * values, ARLO showed excellent agreement with LM, while LL showed only limited agreements with ARLO and LM. Compared with LM and LL in the liver, ARLO was 125 and 8 times faster using our Matlab implementations, and 156 and 13 times faster using our C++ implementations. In C++ implementations, ARLO reduced the online whole-brain processing time from 9 min 15 s of LM and 35 s of LL to 2.7 s, providing T2 * maps approximately in real time. CONCLUSION: Due to comparable accuracy and significantly higher speed, ARLO can be considered as a valid alternative to the conventional LM algorithm for online T2 * mapping.
PURPOSE: To develop a fast and accurate monoexponential fitting algorithm based on Auto-Regression on Linear Operations (ARLO) of data, and to validate its accuracy and computational speed by comparing it with the conventional Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Log-Linear (LL) algorithms. METHODS: ARLO, LM, and LL performances for T2* mapping were evaluated in simulation and in vivo imaging of liver (n=15) and myocardial (n=1) iron overload patients and the brain (two healthy volunteers). RESULTS: In simulations, ARLO consistently delivered accuracy similar to LM and significantly superior to LL. In in vivo mapping of T2 * values, ARLO showed excellent agreement with LM, while LL showed only limited agreements with ARLO and LM. Compared with LM and LL in the liver, ARLO was 125 and 8 times faster using our Matlab implementations, and 156 and 13 times faster using our C++ implementations. In C++ implementations, ARLO reduced the online whole-brain processing time from 9 min 15 s of LM and 35 s of LL to 2.7 s, providing T2 * maps approximately in real time. CONCLUSION: Due to comparable accuracy and significantly higher speed, ARLO can be considered as a valid alternative to the conventional LM algorithm for online T2 * mapping.
Authors: Christian Langkammer; Nikolaus Krebs; Walter Goessler; Eva Scheurer; Franz Ebner; Kathrin Yen; Franz Fazekas; Stefan Ropele Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: John C Wood; Cathleen Enriquez; Nilesh Ghugre; J Michael Tyzka; Susan Carson; Marvin D Nelson; Thomas D Coates Journal: Blood Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: John-Paul Carpenter; Taigang He; Paul Kirk; Michael Roughton; Lisa J Anderson; Sofia V de Noronha; Mary N Sheppard; John B Porter; J Malcolm Walker; John C Wood; Renzo Galanello; Gianluca Forni; Gualtiero Catani; Gildo Matta; Suthat Fucharoen; Adam Fleming; Michael J House; Greg Black; David N Firmin; Timothy G St Pierre; Dudley J Pennell Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Charles A McKenzie; Ethan Brodsky; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jane S Hankins; M Beth McCarville; Ralf B Loeffler; Matthew P Smeltzer; Mihaela Onciu; Fredric A Hoffer; Chin-Shang Li; Winfred C Wang; Russell E Ware; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Blood Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Ruitian Song; Ralf B Loeffler; Joseph L Holtrop; M Beth McCarville; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhe Liu; Yan Wen; Pascal Spincemaille; Shun Zhang; Yihao Yao; Thanh D Nguyen; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ramin Jafari; Sujit Sheth; Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yan Wen; Yihao Guo; Kofi Deh; Zhe Liu; Daniel Margolis; Gary M Brittenham; Andrea S Kierans; Yi Wang Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-01-13 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Andrew W Gorman; Kofi M Deh; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Julie R White; Ernest Victor Groman; Clark A Fisher; Kelly M Gillen; Pascal Spincemaille; Skye Rasmussen; Martin R Prince; Henning U Voss; Winrich A Freiwald; Yi Wang Journal: Comp Med Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Yan Wen; Thanh D Nguyen; Zhe Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Dong Zhou; Alexey Dimov; Youngwook Kee; Kofi Deh; Jiwon Kim; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 4.668