Jingwei Zhang1,2, Tian Liu3, Ajay Gupta2, Pascal Spincemaille2, Thanh D Nguyen2, Yi Wang1,2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 3. Medimagemetric, LLC, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantitatively map cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen ( CMRO2) and oxygen extraction fraction ( OEF) in human brains using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and arterial spin labeling-measured cerebral blood flow (CBF) before and after caffeine vasoconstriction. METHODS: Using the multiecho, three-dimensional gradient echo sequence and an oral bolus of 200 mg caffeine, whole brain CMRO2 and OEF were mapped at 3-mm isotropic resolution on 13 healthy subjects. The QSM-based CMRO2 was compared with an R2*-based CMRO2 to analyze the regional consistency within cortical gray matter (CGM) with the scaling in the R2* method set to provide same total CMRO2 as the QSM method for each subject. RESULTS: Compared to precaffeine, susceptibility increased (5.1 ± 1.1 ppb; P < 0.01) and CBF decreased (-23.6 ± 6.7 ml/100 g/min; P < 0.01) at 25-min postcaffeine in CGM. This corresponded to a CMRO2 of 153.0 ± 26.4 μmol/100 g/min with an OEF of 33.9 ± 9.6% and 54.5 ± 13.2% (P < 0.01) pre- and postcaffeine, respectively, at CGM, and a CMRO2 of 58.0 ± 26.6 μmol/100 g/min at white matter. CMRO2 from both QSM- and R2*-based methods showed good regional consistency (P > 0.05), but quantitation of R2*-based CMRO2 required an additional scaling factor. CONCLUSION: QSM can be used with perfusion measurements pre- and postcaffeine vascoconstriction to map CMRO2 and OEF.
PURPOSE: To quantitatively map cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen ( CMRO2) and oxygen extraction fraction ( OEF) in human brains using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and arterial spin labeling-measured cerebral blood flow (CBF) before and after caffeine vasoconstriction. METHODS: Using the multiecho, three-dimensional gradient echo sequence and an oral bolus of 200 mg caffeine, whole brain CMRO2 and OEF were mapped at 3-mm isotropic resolution on 13 healthy subjects. The QSM-based CMRO2 was compared with an R2*-based CMRO2 to analyze the regional consistency within cortical gray matter (CGM) with the scaling in the R2* method set to provide same total CMRO2 as the QSM method for each subject. RESULTS: Compared to precaffeine, susceptibility increased (5.1 ± 1.1 ppb; P < 0.01) and CBF decreased (-23.6 ± 6.7 ml/100 g/min; P < 0.01) at 25-min postcaffeine in CGM. This corresponded to a CMRO2 of 153.0 ± 26.4 μmol/100 g/min with an OEF of 33.9 ± 9.6% and 54.5 ± 13.2% (P < 0.01) pre- and postcaffeine, respectively, at CGM, and a CMRO2 of 58.0 ± 26.6 μmol/100 g/min at white matter. CMRO2 from both QSM- and R2*-based methods showed good regional consistency (P > 0.05), but quantitation of R2*-based CMRO2 required an additional scaling factor. CONCLUSION: QSM can be used with perfusion measurements pre- and postcaffeine vascoconstriction to map CMRO2 and OEF.
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Tian Liu; Jing Liu; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Ildar Khalidov; James Robert Ledoux; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Felix W Wehrli; Zachary B Rodgers; Varsha Jain; Michael C Langham; Cheng Li; Daniel J Licht; Jeremy Magland Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Jinwei Zhang; Zhe Liu; Shun Zhang; Hang Zhang; Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D Nguyen; Mert R Sabuncu; Yi Wang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Zhe Liu; Yan Wen; Pascal Spincemaille; Shun Zhang; Yihao Yao; Thanh D Nguyen; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ramin Jafari; Sujit Sheth; Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yan Wen; Yihao Guo; Kofi Deh; Zhe Liu; Daniel Margolis; Gary M Brittenham; Andrea S Kierans; Yi Wang Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-01-13 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: K Fujimoto; I Uwano; M Sasaki; S Oshida; S Tsutsui; W Yanagihara; S Fujiwara; M Kobayashi; Y Kubo; K Yoshida; K Terasaki; K Ogasawara Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 3.825