PURPOSE: To develop a computationally fast and accurate algorithm for mono-exponential signal modelling and validate the new technique in the context of R2* mapping for iron overload assessment. METHODS: An algorithm is introduced that directly calculates R2* values from a series of images based on integration of the mono-exponential signal decay curve. The algorithm is fast, because fitting is avoided and only arithmetic computations without iterations are applied. Precision and accuracy of the method is determined in comparison to the conventional log-linear (LL), nonlinear least-squares-based Levenberg-Marquardt (NLM), and squared nonlinear Levenberg-Marquardt (SQNLM) methods, which rely on iterative curve fitting. RESULTS: In simulations, the signal integration based method consistently had the same or better accuracy than the LL, NLM, and SQNLM algorithms for R2* values ranging from 50 s-1 to 1200 s-1 . In phantoms and in vivo (12 participants), this method was robust over a wide range of R2* values and signal-to-noise ratios. Computation times were approximately 100, 1460, and 930 times faster than those of the LL, NLM, and SQNLM methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The fast signal integration method accurately calculates R2* maps. It has the potential to replace conventional, mono-exponential fitting methods for quantitative MRI such as R2* parameter mapping. Magn Reson Med 79:2978-2985, 2018.
PURPOSE: To develop a computationally fast and accurate algorithm for mono-exponential signal modelling and validate the new technique in the context of R2* mapping for iron overload assessment. METHODS: An algorithm is introduced that directly calculates R2* values from a series of images based on integration of the mono-exponential signal decay curve. The algorithm is fast, because fitting is avoided and only arithmetic computations without iterations are applied. Precision and accuracy of the method is determined in comparison to the conventional log-linear (LL), nonlinear least-squares-based Levenberg-Marquardt (NLM), and squared nonlinear Levenberg-Marquardt (SQNLM) methods, which rely on iterative curve fitting. RESULTS: In simulations, the signal integration based method consistently had the same or better accuracy than the LL, NLM, and SQNLM algorithms for R2* values ranging from 50 s-1 to 1200 s-1 . In phantoms and in vivo (12 participants), this method was robust over a wide range of R2* values and signal-to-noise ratios. Computation times were approximately 100, 1460, and 930 times faster than those of the LL, NLM, and SQNLM methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The fast signal integration method accurately calculates R2* maps. It has the potential to replace conventional, mono-exponential fitting methods for quantitative MRI such as R2* parameter mapping. Magn Reson Med 79:2978-2985, 2018.
Authors: M Beth McCarville; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Ralf B Loeffler; Matthew P Smeltzer; Ruitan Song; Chin-Shang Li; Jane S Hankins Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2010-03-24
Authors: John C Wood; Cathleen Enriquez; Nilesh Ghugre; J Michael Tyzka; Susan Carson; Marvin D Nelson; Thomas D Coates Journal: Blood Date: 2005-04-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Brian A Taylor; Ralf B Loeffler; Ruitian Song; M Beth McCarville; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sven Hoppe; Sebastian Quirbach; Tallal C Mamisch; Fabian G Krause; Stefan Werlen; Lorin M Benneker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-04-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Taigang He; Peter D Gatehouse; Gillian C Smith; Raad H Mohiaddin; Dudley J Pennell; David N Firmin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jane S Hankins; M Beth McCarville; Ralf B Loeffler; Matthew P Smeltzer; Mihaela Onciu; Fredric A Hoffer; Chin-Shang Li; Winfred C Wang; Russell E Ware; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Blood Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Yanqiu Feng; Taigang He; Peter D Gatehouse; Xinzhong Li; Mohammed Harith Alam; Dudley J Pennell; Wufan Chen; David N Firmin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 4.668