PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of in vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in cardiac MRI and to show that mixed-venous oxygen saturation (SvO2 ) can be measured non-invasively using QSM. METHODS: Electrocardiographic-gated multi-echo 2D gradient echo data were collected at 1.5 T from 14 healthy volunteers during successive breath-holds. Phase wraps and fat chemical shift were removed using a graph-cut-based phase analysis and IDEAL in an iterative approach. The large susceptibility range from air in the lungs to blood in the heart was addressed by using the preconditioning approach in the dipole field inversion. SvO2 was calculated based on the difference in blood susceptibility between the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV). Cardiac QSM quality was assessed by two independent readers. RESULTS: Nine out of fourteen volunteers (64%) yielded interpretable cardiac QSM. QSM maps showed strong differential contrast between RV and LV blood with RV blood having higher susceptibility values (291.5 ± 32.4 ppb), which correspond to 78.3 ± 2.3% SvO2 . CONCLUSION: In vivo cardiac QSM is feasible and can be used to measure SvO2 , but improvements in data acquisition are needed. Magn Reson Med 79:1545-1552, 2018.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of in vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in cardiac MRI and to show that mixed-venous oxygen saturation (SvO2 ) can be measured non-invasively using QSM. METHODS: Electrocardiographic-gated multi-echo 2D gradient echo data were collected at 1.5 T from 14 healthy volunteers during successive breath-holds. Phase wraps and fat chemical shift were removed using a graph-cut-based phase analysis and IDEAL in an iterative approach. The large susceptibility range from air in the lungs to blood in the heart was addressed by using the preconditioning approach in the dipole field inversion. SvO2 was calculated based on the difference in blood susceptibility between the right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV). Cardiac QSM quality was assessed by two independent readers. RESULTS: Nine out of fourteen volunteers (64%) yielded interpretable cardiac QSM. QSM maps showed strong differential contrast between RV and LV blood with RV blood having higher susceptibility values (291.5 ± 32.4 ppb), which correspond to 78.3 ± 2.3% SvO2 . CONCLUSION: In vivo cardiac QSM is feasible and can be used to measure SvO2 , but improvements in data acquisition are needed. Magn Reson Med 79:1545-1552, 2018.
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Angel R Pineda; Zhifei Wen; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Garry E Gold; Christopher H Beaulieu; Norbert J Pelc Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tian Liu; Ildar Khalidov; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Jing Liu; A John Tsiouris; Yi Wang Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Lynne E Nield; Xiuling Qi; Shi-Joon Yoo; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo; Lisa K Hornberger; Graham A Wright Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2002-04-16
Authors: Martin Uecker; Peng Lai; Mark J Murphy; Patrick Virtue; Michael Elad; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhe Liu; Yan Wen; Pascal Spincemaille; Shun Zhang; Yihao Yao; Thanh D Nguyen; Yi Wang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Xing Lu; Michael Carl; Adam C Searleman; Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Annette von Drygalski; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Brianna F Moon; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; Eileen Hwuang; Michael P Solomon; Anya T Hall; Rishabh Kumar; Nicholas J Josselyn; Elizabeth M Higbee-Dempsey; Andrew Tsourkas; Akito Imai; Keitaro Okamoto; Yoshiaki Saito; James J Pilla; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Cory Tschabrunn; Samuel J Keeney; Estibaliz Castillero; Giovanni Ferrari; Steffen Jockusch; Felix W Wehrli; Haochang Shou; Victor A Ferrari; Yuchi Han; Avanti Gulhane; Harold Litt; William Matthai; Walter R Witschey Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Yan Wen; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Thanh D Nguyen; Zhe Liu; Evelyn M Horn; Harsimran Singh; Jonathan Kochav; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Kofi Deh; Jiwon Kim; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang; Pascal Spincemaille Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Alberto Aimo; Li Huang; Andrew Tyler; Andrea Barison; Nicola Martini; Luigi F Saccaro; Sébastien Roujol; Pier-Giorgio Masci Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Brianna F Moon; Srikant Kamesh Iyer; Nicholas J Josselyn; Eileen Hwuang; Sophia Swago; Samuel J Keeney; Estibaliz Castillero; Giovanni Ferrari; James J Pilla; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Cory M Tschabrunn; Haochang Shou; William Matthai; Felix W Wehrli; Victor A Ferrari; Yuchi Han; Harold Litt; Walter R Witschey Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 3.737