Literature DB >> 29584598

Use of 2D U-Net Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Cartilage and Meniscus Segmentation of Knee MR Imaging Data to Determine Relaxometry and Morphometry.

Berk Norman1, Valentina Pedoia1, Sharmila Majumdar1.   

Abstract

Purpose To analyze how automatic segmentation translates in accuracy and precision to morphology and relaxometry compared with manual segmentation and increases the speed and accuracy of the work flow that uses quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to study knee degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods This retrospective study involved the analysis of 638 MR imaging volumes from two data cohorts acquired at 3.0 T: (a) spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state T1ρ-weighted images and (b) three-dimensional (3D) double-echo steady-state (DESS) images. A deep learning model based on the U-Net convolutional network architecture was developed to perform automatic segmentation. Cartilage and meniscus compartments were manually segmented by skilled technicians and radiologists for comparison. Performance of the automatic segmentation was evaluated on Dice coefficient overlap with the manual segmentation, as well as by the automatic segmentations' ability to quantify, in a longitudinally repeatable way, relaxometry and morphology. Results The models produced strong Dice coefficients, particularly for 3D-DESS images, ranging between 0.770 and 0.878 in the cartilage compartments to 0.809 and 0.753 for the lateral meniscus and medial meniscus, respectively. The models averaged 5 seconds to generate the automatic segmentations. Average correlations between manual and automatic quantification of T1ρ and T2 values were 0.8233 and 0.8603, respectively, and 0.9349 and 0.9384 for volume and thickness, respectively. Longitudinal precision of the automatic method was comparable with that of the manual one. Conclusion U-Net demonstrates efficacy and precision in quickly generating accurate segmentations that can be used to extract relaxation times and morphologic characterization and values that can be used in the monitoring and diagnosis of OA. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29584598      PMCID: PMC6013406          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Knee cartilage: efficient and reproducible segmentation on high-spatial-resolution MR images with the semiautomated graph-cut algorithm method.

Authors:  Hackjoon Shim; Samuel Chang; Cheng Tao; Jin-Hong Wang; C Kent Kwoh; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Deep feature learning for knee cartilage segmentation using a triplanar convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Adhish Prasoon; Kersten Petersen; Christian Igel; François Lauze; Erik Dam; Mads Nielsen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

3.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II.

Authors:  Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-01

5.  Combined image processing techniques for characterization of MRI cartilage of the knee.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan Bauer; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

6.  Cartilage morphology and T1ρ and T2 quantification in ACL-reconstructed knees: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  F Su; J F Hilton; L Nardo; S Wu; F Liang; T M Link; C B Ma; X Li
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Magnetic resonance evaluation of the interrelationship between articular cartilage and trabecular bone of the osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  C T Lindsey; A Narasimhan; J M Adolfo; Hua Jin; L S Steinbach; T Link; M Ries; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Robert Stahl; Keh-Yang Lee; Stefanie Krause; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Automatic knee cartilage segmentation from multi-contrast MR images using support vector machine classification with spatial dependencies.

Authors:  Kunlei Zhang; Wenmiao Lu; Pina Marziliano
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Kunz; M Schutzer; M Hudelmaier; R D Jackson; J Yu; C B Eaton; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  84 in total

1.  Fully automated 3D aortic segmentation of 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic analysis using deep learning.

Authors:  Haben Berhane; Michael Scott; Mohammed Elbaz; Kelly Jarvis; Patrick McCarthy; James Carr; Chris Malaisrie; Ryan Avery; Alex J Barker; Joshua D Robinson; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging.

Authors:  M T Duong; J D Rudie; J Wang; L Xie; S Mohan; J C Gee; A M Rauschecker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Technical and clinical overview of deep learning in radiology.

Authors:  Daiju Ueda; Akitoshi Shimazaki; Yukio Miki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  A 3D deep convolutional neural network approach for the automated measurement of cerebellum tracer uptake in FDG PET-CT scans.

Authors:  Xiaofan Xiong; Timothy J Linhardt; Weiren Liu; Brian J Smith; Wenqing Sun; Christian Bauer; John J Sunderland; Michael M Graham; John M Buatti; Reinhard R Beichel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Deep convolutional neural networks with multiplane consensus labeling for lung function quantification using UTE proton MRI.

Authors:  Wei Zha; Sean B Fain; Mark L Schiebler; Michael D Evans; Scott K Nagle; Fang Liu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Romil F Shah; Alejandro M Martinez; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas P Vail; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Knee menisci segmentation and relaxometry of 3D ultrashort echo time cones MR imaging using attention U-Net with transfer learning.

Authors:  Michal Byra; Mei Wu; Xiaodong Zhang; Hyungseok Jang; Ya-Jun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Sameer Shah; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Automated plaque characterization using deep learning on coronary intravascular optical coherence tomographic images.

Authors:  Juhwan Lee; David Prabhu; Chaitanya Kolluru; Yazan Gharaibeh; Vladislav N Zimin; Hiram G Bezerra; David L Wilson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Learning osteoarthritis imaging biomarkers from bone surface spherical encoding.

Authors:  Alejandro Morales Martinez; Francesco Caliva; Io Flament; Felix Liu; Jinhee Lee; Peng Cao; Rutwik Shah; Sharmila Majumdar; Valentina Pedoia
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.