Literature DB >> 21258903

Attention doesn't slide: spatiotopic updating after eye movements instantiates a new, discrete attentional locus.

Julie D Golomb1, Alexandria C Marino, Marvin M Chun, James A Mazer.   

Abstract

During natural vision, eye movements can drastically alter the retinotopic (eye-centered) coordinates of locations and objects, yet the spatiotopic (world-centered) percept remains stable. Maintaining visuospatial attention in spatiotopic coordinates requires updating of attentional representations following each eye movement. However, this updating is not instantaneous; attentional facilitation temporarily lingers at the previous retinotopic location after a saccade, a phenomenon known as the retinotopic attentional trace. At various times after a saccade, we probed attention at an intermediate location between the retinotopic and spatiotopic locations to determine whether a single locus of attentional facilitation slides progressively from the previous retinotopic location to the appropriate spatiotopic location, or whether retinotopic facilitation decays while a new, independent spatiotopic locus concurrently becomes active. Facilitation at the intermediate location was not significant at any time, suggesting that top-down attention can result in enhancement of discrete retinotopic and spatiotopic locations without passing through intermediate locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21258903      PMCID: PMC3097429          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0016-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

1.  Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging.

Authors:  Ayelet Sapir; Amy Hayes; Avishai Henik; Shai Danziger; Robert Rafal
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Time-course of sensitivity changes as attention shifts to an unpredictable location.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1992-04

3.  Analog versus discrete shifts of attention across the visual field.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

4.  Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation.

Authors:  Chi-Hung Juan; Stephanie M Shorter-Jacobi; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  On analog movements of visual attention.

Authors:  S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-02

7.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; L Riggio; I Dascola; C Umiltá
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

9.  Movements of attention across the visual field.

Authors:  Y Tsal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  19 in total

1.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

3.  Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Authors:  Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The Binding Problem after an eye movement.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-04-04

6.  The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Steven J Luck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Orienting of attention: Then and now.

Authors:  Michael I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Feature-binding errors after eye movements and shifts of attention.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Zara E L'heureux; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19

9.  Pre-saccadic shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Jason B Mattingley; Roger W Remington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Buildup of spatial information over time and across eye-movements.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; M Concetta Morrone; David C Burr
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.