Literature DB >> 28070793

Object-location binding across a saccade: A retinotopic spatial congruency bias.

Anna Shafer-Skelton1, Colin N Kupitz1, Julie D Golomb2.   

Abstract

Despite frequent eye movements that rapidly shift the locations of objects on our retinas, our visual system creates a stable perception of the world. To do this, it must convert eye-centered (retinotopic) input to world-centered (spatiotopic) percepts. Moreover, for successful behavior we must also incorporate information about object features/identities during this updating - a fundamental challenge that remains to be understood. Here we adapted a recent behavioral paradigm, the "spatial congruency bias," to investigate object-location binding across an eye movement. In two initial baseline experiments, we showed that the spatial congruency bias was present for both gabor and face stimuli in addition to the object stimuli used in the original paradigm. Then, across three main experiments, we found the bias was preserved across an eye movement, but only in retinotopic coordinates: Subjects were more likely to perceive two stimuli as having the same features/identity when they were presented in the same retinotopic location. Strikingly, there was no evidence of location binding in the more ecologically relevant spatiotopic (world-centered) coordinates; the reference frame did not update to spatiotopic even at longer post-saccade delays, nor did it transition to spatiotopic with more complex stimuli (gabors, shapes, and faces all showed a retinotopic congruency bias). Our results suggest that object-location binding may be tied to retinotopic coordinates, and that it may need to be re-established following each eye movement rather than being automatically updated to spatiotopic coordinates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature binding; Object recognition; Remapping; Retinotopic; Spatiotopic; Visual stability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28070793      PMCID: PMC5354979          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1263-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  86 in total

1.  Rapid formation of spatiotopic representations as revealed by inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Ehud Zohary; Galia Avidan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Transsaccadic integration of visual features in a line intersection task.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Matthias Niemeier; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem.

Authors:  Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider; B Bridgeman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Immediate post-saccadic information mediates space constancy.

Authors:  H Deubel; B Bridgeman; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex.

Authors:  J P Gottlieb; M Kusunoki; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT.

Authors:  Giovanni d'Avossa; Michela Tosetti; Sofia Crespi; Laura Biagi; David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Binding Problem after an eye movement.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-04-04

3.  Binding object features to locations: Does the "spatial congruency bias" update with object movement?

Authors:  Avni N Bapat; Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The influence of spatial location on same-different judgments of facial identity and expression.

Authors:  Maurryce D Starks; Anna Shafer-Skelton; Michela Paradiso; Aleix M Martinez; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Visual Remapping.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; James A Mazer
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 7.745

6.  Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuri A Markov; Igor S Utochkin; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Spatial congruency bias in identifying objects is triggered by retinal position congruence: Examination using the Ternus-Pikler illusion.

Authors:  Kyoshiro Sasaki; Atsunori Ariga; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.