Literature DB >> 24627455

Bone mineral density values derived from routine lumbar spine multidetector row CT predict osteoporotic vertebral fractures and screw loosening.

B J Schwaiger1, A S Gersing2, T Baum3, P B Noël3, C Zimmer2, J S Bauer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Established methods of assessing bone mineral density are associated with additional radiation exposure to the patient. In this study, we aimed to validate a method of assessing bone mineral density in routine multidetector row CT of the lumbar spine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 38 patients, bone mineral density was assessed in quantitative CT as a standard of reference and in sagittal reformations derived from standard multidetector row CT studies without IV contrast. MDCT-to-quantitative CT conversion equations were calculated and then applied to baseline multidetector row scans of another 62 patients. After a mean follow-up of 15 ± 6 months, patients were re-assessed for incidental fractures and screw loosening after spondylodesis (n = 49).
RESULTS: We observed conversion equations bone mineral densityMDCT = 0.78 × Hounsfield unitMDCTmg/mL (correlation with bone mineral densityquantitative CT, R(2) = 0.92, P < .001) for 120 kV(peak) tube voltage and bone mineral densityMDCT = 0.86 × Hounsfield unitMDCTmg/mL (R(2) = 0.81, P < .001) for 140 kVp, respectively. Seven patients (11.3%) had existing osteoporotic vertebral fractures at baseline, while 8 patients (12.9%) showed incidental osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Screw loosening was detected in 28 patients (57.1% of patients with spondylodesis). Patients with existing vertebral fractures showed significantly lower bone mineral densityMDCT than patients without fractures (P < .01). At follow-up, patients with incidental fractures and screw loosening after spondylodesis, respectively, showed significantly lower baseline bone mineral densityMDCT (P < .001 each).
CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study demonstrated that converted bone mineral density values derived from routine lumbar spine multidetector row CT adequately differentiated patients with and without osteoporotic fractures and could predict incidental fractures and screw loosening after spondylodesis.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627455      PMCID: PMC7964446          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  30 in total

Review 1.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT.

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Age- and sex-specific differences in the factor of risk for vertebral fracture: a population-based study using QCT.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; L Joseph Melton; B Lawrence Riggs; John Muller; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Peggy A Rouleau; Cynthia H McCollough; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Karthikeyan E Ponnusamy; Sravisht Iyer; Gaurav Gupta; A Jay Khanna
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Boris B Koppers; Thomas Licht; Jan Bauer; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Lower preoperative Hounsfield unit measurements are associated with adjacent segment fracture after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Dennis S Meredith; Joseph J Schreiber; Fadi Taher; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Can abdominal multi-detector CT diagnose spinal osteoporosis?

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Giorgos Papadokostakis; Effie Petinellis; John Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  28 in total

1.  L1 vertebral density on CT is too variable with different scanning protocols to be a useful screening tool for osteoporosis in everyday practice.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Gerety; Philip Wp Bearcroft
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Hounsfield units as predictor for cage subsidence and loss of reduction: following posterior-anterior stabilization in thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Authors:  Bernhard Wilhelm Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Ulrich J Spiegl; Thomas Mendel; Gunther Olaf Hofmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Vertebral and femoral bone mineral density and bone strength in prostate cancer patients assessed in phantomless PET/CT examinations.

Authors:  Benedikt J Schwaiger; David L Kopperdahl; Lorenzo Nardo; Luca Facchetti; Alexandra S Gersing; Jan Neumann; Kwang J Lee; Tony M Keaveny; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Low volumetric bone density is a risk factor for early complications after spine fusion surgery.

Authors:  Y Liu; A Dash; A Krez; H J Kim; M Cunningham; F Schwab; A Hughes; B Carlson; A Samuel; E Marty; H Moore; D J McMahon; J A Carrino; R S Bockman; E M Stein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT.

Authors:  Esther Pompe; Martin J Willemink; Gawein R Dijkhuis; Harald J J Verhaar; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature.

Authors:  U J Spiegl; C Josten; B M Devitt; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners.

Authors:  Yali Li; Yaojun Jiang; Huilong Liu; Xi Yu; Sihui Chen; Duoshan Ma; Jianbo Gao; Yan Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

8.  [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Application of three-dimensional reconstruction simulation to define the starting point of lumbar cortical bone trajectory].

Authors:  Zhen Huang; Ning Sun; Jiabin Ren; Rui Li; Xin Liu; Yuefei Li; Jingwei Bi; Zhaozhong Sun
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15

10.  Assessing the effects of lumbar posterior stabilization and fusion to vertebral bone density in stabilized and adjacent segments by using Hounsfield unit.

Authors:  Özgür Demir; Erol Öksüz; Fatih Ersay Deniz; Osman Demir
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.