Literature DB >> 16939406

Age- and sex-specific differences in the factor of risk for vertebral fracture: a population-based study using QCT.

Mary L Bouxsein1, L Joseph Melton, B Lawrence Riggs, John Muller, Elizabeth J Atkinson, Ann L Oberg, Richard A Robb, Jon J Camp, Peggy A Rouleau, Cynthia H McCollough, Sundeep Khosla.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We used QCT scans obtained in 687 men and women, 21-97 years of age, to estimate the factor of risk for vertebral fracture, Phi(vert), defined as the ratio of spinal loading to vertebral strength. With age, vertebral strength declined and Phi(vert) increased significantly more in women than men. Age- and sex-specific differences in Phi(vert) closely resembled previously reported vertebral fracture incidence.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the high prevalence of vertebral fractures, little is known about the interaction between spinal loading and vertebral fragility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the ratio of spinal loading to vertebral strength (i.e., the factor of risk, Phi(vert)) in an age- and sex-stratified population-based sample of 700 women and men 21-97 years of age. We measured volumetric BMD (vBMD, mg/cm3) and cross-sectional area (CSA, cm2) of the midvertebral bodies of L1-L3 using QCT and computed vertebral compressive strength from these data using engineering beam theory. A biomechanical model of the trunk was used to estimate compressive forces applied to the L3 vertebral body during standing, bending forward, and bending forward while lifting 10 kg. The factor of risk for fracture, Phi(vert), was computed as the ratio of spinal compressive force to vertebral strength for each activity.
RESULTS: Men had a higher vertebral strength at all ages, largely because of their greater CSA. Whereas both sexes exhibited a marked decline in vertebral compressive strength with age (p < 0.001), the decline was greater in women than men (-43% versus -31%, p = 0.008). Compressive forces on L3 were greater in men than women, because of their greater body weight and height. For both sexes, forces during bending and lifting were 8-fold higher than those experienced during upright standing. For all activities, Phi(vert) increased with age, but significantly more so in women than men (p < 0.001). For bending and lifting, Phi(vert-bending) exceeded 1.0 in 30% of women and 12% of men > or =50 years of age, values that are similar to the reported frequency of vertebral fracture.
CONCLUSION: These findings illustrate potential mechanisms underlying vertebral fractures and provide strong rationale for further evaluation of this QCT-based biomechanical approach for assessment of fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939406     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  59 in total

1.  QCT measures of bone strength at the thoracic and lumbar spine: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Blaine A Christiansen; Serkalem Demissie; Kerry E Broe; Qiong Louie-Gao; L Adrienne Cupples; Benjamin J Roberts; Rajaram Manoharam; John D'Agostino; Thomas Lang; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Whole bone mechanics and bone quality.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Unmet needs in fracture prevention: new European guidelines for the investigation and registration of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Spatial variation in osteonal bone properties relative to tissue and animal age.

Authors:  Samuel Gourion-Arsiquaud; Jayme C Burket; Lorena M Havill; Edward DiCarlo; Stephen B Doty; Richard Mendelsohn; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Adele L Boskey
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Associations Between Lean Mass, Muscle Strength and Power, and Skeletal Size, Density and Strength in Older Men.

Authors:  Didier Chalhoub; Robert Boudreau; Susan Greenspan; Anne B Newman; Joseph Zmuda; Andrew W Frank-Wilson; Nayana Nagaraj; Andrew R Hoffman; Nancy E Lane; Marcia L Stefanick; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Tien Dam; Peggy M Cawthon; Eric S Orwoll; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  FoxOs: Unifying links between oxidative stress and skeletal homeostasis.

Authors:  Stavroula Kousteni
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Forum on aging and skeletal health: summary of the proceedings of an ASBMR workshop.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Teresita M Bellido; Marc K Drezner; Catherine M Gordon; Tamara B Harris; Douglas P Kiel; Barbara E Kream; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane B Lian; Charlotte A Peterson; Clifford J Rosen; John P Williams; Karen K Winer; Sherry S Sherman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Association of vertebral endplate microstructure with bone strength in men and women.

Authors:  MeiLissa McKay; Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Ali Guermazi; Jingjiang Liu; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Vertebral Volumetric Bone Density and Strength Are Impaired in Women With Low-Weight and Atypical Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Katherine N Bachmann; Melanie Schorr; Alexander G Bruno; Miriam A Bredella; Elizabeth A Lawson; Corey M Gill; Vibha Singhal; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Meghan Slattery; Kamryn T Eddy; Seda Ebrahimi; Stuart L Koman; James M Greenblatt; Robert J Keane; Thomas Weigel; Madhusmita Misra; Mary L Bouxsein; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Better tools for assessing osteoporosis.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; Sundeep Khosla; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.