Literature DB >> 23450010

Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement.

D T Cawley1, N Kelly, J P McGarry, F J Shannon.   

Abstract

The optimum cementing technique for the tibial component in cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) remains controversial. The technique of cementing, the volume of cement and the penetration are largely dependent on the operator, and hence large variations can occur. Clinical, experimental and computational studies have been performed, with conflicting results. Early implant migration is an indication of loosening. Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure in primary TKR and is the product of several factors. Sufficient penetration of cement has been shown to increase implant stability. This review discusses the relevant literature regarding all aspects of the cementing of the tibial component at primary TKR.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23450010     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.29586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  31 in total

1.  Loss of cement-bone interlock in retrieved tibial components from total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Jacklyn R Goodheart; Timothy H Izant; Clare M Rimnac; Richard J Cleary; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of different cement application techniques for tibial component fixation in TKA.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Nicholas E Bishop; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  An in vitro comparison of tibial tray cementation using gun pressurization or pulsed lavage.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Intrusion Characteristics of High Viscosity Bone Cements for the Tibial Component of a Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Negative Pressure Intrusion Cementing Technique.

Authors:  Nam L Dinh; Alexander C Chong; Justin K Walden; Scott C Adrian; Robert P Cusick
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

5.  Does negative pressure intrusion cementing technique improve the cement penetration under the tibial component? A comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciola; Federico De Meo; Pietro Cavaliere
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-27

6.  Peri-Implant Distribution of Polyethylene Debris in Postmortem-Retrieved Knee Arthroplasties: Can Polyethylene Debris Explain Loss of Cement-Bone Interlock in Successful Total Knee Arthroplasties?

Authors:  Karen I Cyndari; Jacklyn R Goodheart; Mark A Miller; Megan E Oest; Timothy A Damron; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Increased initial cement-bone interlock correlates with reduced total knee arthroplasty micro-motion following in vivo service.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Matthew J Terbush; Jacklyn R Goodheart; Timothy H Izant; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The effect of multiple drilling on a sclerotic proximal tibia during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Ahn; Seung Hyo Jeong; Sung Hyun Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Experimental and computational micromechanics at the tibial cement-trabeculae interface.

Authors:  Priyanka Srinivasan; Mark A Miller; Nico Verdonschot; Kenneth A Mann; Dennis Janssen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Does a simple syringe applicator enhance bone cement set up time in knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Sarah E Dalton; Anton Khlopas; Assem A Sultan; Gannon L Curtis; Matthew A Harb; Qais Naziri; Jared M Newman; John W Barrington; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.