Literature DB >> 8496223

Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement.

R S Majkowski1, A W Miles, G C Bannister, J Perkins, G J Taylor.   

Abstract

We studied the effects of nine techniques of bone surface preparation on cement penetration and shear strength at the cement-bone interface in a standard model of bovine cancellous bone. In unprepared bone the mean penetration was 0.2 mm and the mean shear strength of the interface was 1.9 MPa, less than that of the underlying bone. Brushing with surface irrigation gave mean penetrations of 0.6 to 1.4 mm and mean shear strengths of 1.5 to 9.9 MPa. In 50% of specimens the interface was weaker than the underlying bone. The use of pressurised lavage resulted in mean penetrations of 4.8 to 7.9 mm and mean shear strengths of 26.5 to 36.1 MPa, which were greater than those of the cancellous bone in all specimens. Pressurised lavage was equally effective alone or in combination with brushing, and its efficacy was not altered by using pulsed or continuous jets, or by changing the temperature of the solution from 21 degrees C to 37 degrees C.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8496223     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B3.8496223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  13 in total

1.  [The influence of jet-lavage systems on in vitro cement penetration].

Authors:  C-R Becker; B Lehner; S Ungethüm; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Obtaining an optimal bone-cement interface in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Blake; Peter J Cox
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Effect of hand packing versus cement gun pressurization on cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Kopec; Joseph C Milbrandt; Todd Duellman; Doug Mangan; D Gordon Allan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The effect of bone porosity on the shear strength of the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  Rouin Amirfeyz; Gordon Bannister
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Timing of femoral prosthesis insertion during cemented arthroplasty: cement curing and static mechanical strength in an in vivo model.

Authors:  Stephen Hunt; Craig Stone; Shane Seal
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  An in vitro comparison of tibial tray cementation using gun pressurization or pulsed lavage.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Katrin Nagel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  In vivo loss of cement-bone interlock reduces fixation strength in total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Jacklyn R Goodheart; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The influence of a suction device on fixation of a cemented cup using RSA.

Authors:  A John Timperley; Sarah L Whitehouse; Patrick G Hourigan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cementation technique for elbow arthroplasty; an international survey.

Authors:  Tariq A Kwaees; Rohit Singhal; Denise Eygendaal; Charalambos P Charalambous
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.