Literature DB >> 35241521

Pulsatile Lavage During Cementation of Total Knee Arthroplasty - Is Fixation Impaired? A Cadaver Study.

Claudio Glowalla1,2, Max Ertl1, Ulrich Lenze1, Igor Lazic1, Rainer Burgkart1, Jan J Lang1,3, Rudiger VON Eisenhart-Rothe1, Florian Pohlig4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Increasing economic pressure in modern healthcare necessitates an increase in efficiency in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while maintaining high-quality outcomes. Removal of debris using pulsatile lavage (PL) during cement polymerization may considerably reduce the operative duration. However, water can penetrate the interface, resulting in impaired implant fixation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of early-onset PL during bone cement polymerization on implant fixation and operative duration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cemented implantation of tibial trays was performed in 20 fresh-frozen human tibiae from 10 donors in a matched-pair study design in two groups: 1) PL during cement polymerization; and 2) PL after completion of the polymerization process. The cement penetration depth was analysed by computed tomography (CT), and the pull-out force was measured to evaluate primary implant fixation. The duration of the procedure was recorded for both groups.
RESULTS: Comparable pull-out forces were observed in the experimental (2,213 N) and control groups (2,350 N; p=0.68). The mean depth of cement penetration was similar in both groups. PL during cement polymerization could decrease the operative duration by 10 min.
CONCLUSION: The application of PL during cement polymerization could significantly reduce operative duration and had no adverse effect on the mechanical fixation of the tibial component.
Copyright © 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone cement; PMMA; TKA; polymerization; pulsatile lavage; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35241521      PMCID: PMC8931868          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  20 in total

1.  An experimental comparison of different devices for pulsatile high-pressure lavage and their relevance to cement intrusion into cancellous bone.

Authors:  Thomas Kalteis; Dominik Pförringer; Thomas Herold; Martin Handel; Tobias Renkawitz; Wolfgang Plitz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Effect of hand packing versus cement gun pressurization on cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Kopec; Joseph C Milbrandt; Todd Duellman; Doug Mangan; D Gordon Allan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  J M Bert; M McShane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Ronald E Delanois; Jaydev B Mistry; Chukwuweike U Gwam; Nequesha S Mohamed; Ujval S Choksi; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  How much sterile saline should be used for efficient lavage during total knee arthroplasty? Effects of pulse lavage irrigation on removal of bone and cement debris.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Hideo Matsumoto; Toshiro Otani; Taisuke Tomatsu; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P S Walker; M Soudry; F C Ewald; H McVickar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Increased initial cement-bone interlock correlates with reduced total knee arthroplasty micro-motion following in vivo service.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Matthew J Terbush; Jacklyn R Goodheart; Timothy H Izant; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Charles M Lawrie; Rondek Salih; Cindy R Nahhas; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Surgical duration is associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic infection following total knee arthroplasty: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bheeshma Ravi; Richard Jenkinson; Sven O'Heireamhoin; Peter C Austin; Suriya Aktar; Timothy S Leroux; Michael Paterson; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.