Literature DB >> 7976280

The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992.

K Knutson1, S Lewold, O Robertsson, L Lidgren.   

Abstract

1976 through 1992, 30,003 primary knee arthroplasties and their revisions have been recorded in a nation-wide Swedish study. We report on the structure of the register, demographic data and survivorship. We found that operations for osteoarthrosis (OA) counted for the increase in number of arthroplasties in contrast to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where the number had slightly declined. For primary operations, the total knee prostheses have practically eliminated other types in RA and are steadily gaining popularity in OA at the expense of the unicompartmental prostheses. Total knee replacements showed gradually improving survival even in unchanged designs while the unicompartmental prostheses don't, partly because of newly introduced inferior designs. We also found that failed unicompartmental prostheses were best replaced with a tricompartmental prosthesis and that a total revision was to be preferred when a tricompartmental tibial component failed. The risk of the most devastating complications, e.g., infection, leading to extraction of the prosthesis or arthrodesis has decreased considerably also in the last years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7976280     DOI: 10.3109/17453679408995475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  45 in total

Review 1.  Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK.

Authors:  D C Mackay; B Hudson; J R Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Failure patterns of four osseointegrated oral implant systems.

Authors:  M Esposito; J M Hirsch; U Lekholm; P Thomsen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].

Authors:  G Saxler; D Temmen; G Bontemps
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Ethnic differences in preoperative function of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Suraj Joshy; Amit Datta; Anthony Perera; Boban Thomas; Nitish Gogi; Binod Kumar Singh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!

Authors:  K L Luscombe; J Lim; P W Jones; S H White
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Joint responsibility: the need for a national arthroplasty register.

Authors:  D H Sochart; A J Long; M L Porter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-13

7.  Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Bédard; Kelly G Vince; John Redfern; Stacy R Collen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Y Liow; D W Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Current techniques in total knee replacement: results of a national survey.

Authors:  A M Phillips; N J Goddard; J E Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pasqualina L Santaguida; Gillian A Hawker; Pamela L Hudak; Richard Glazier; Nizar N Mahomed; Hans J Kreder; Peter C Coyte; James G Wright
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.