Literature DB >> 24615592

Visual evoked potential and psychophysical contrast thresholds in glaucoma.

Siti Nurliyana Abdullah1, Gordon F Sanderson, Andrew C James, Ted Maddess.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the diagnostic power of electrophysiologically and psychophysically measured contrast thresholds for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Additionally, we investigated whether combining results from the two methods improved diagnostic power.
METHODS: Seven-eight subjects between 40 and 88 years formed the main study group: 21 normal controls (9 males) and 57 glaucoma patients (30 males) were tested. Twenty-two younger control subjects were also tested. Contrast thresholds were determined for a 1 cpd sinusoidal grating, subtending 41° × 52° modulated at 14.3 rps. The thresholds were based on the same staircase method applied to visual evoked potential (VEP) and psychophysical responses (Psyc). Diagnostic power was assessed by the percent area under the curve (%AUC) of receiver operating characteristic plots.
RESULTS: Psyc showed significant age dependence, -0.10 ± 0.02 dB, while VEPs did not. Diagnostic performance for moderate and severe eyes combined was modest: Psyc 74 ± 9.0 % and VEP 72 ± 9.1 %, but improved significantly (p < 0.05) for a simple combined method, up to 90 ± 6.0 % for moderate disease. The combined method improved %AUC for all severities on average (p < 0.03). Canonical correlation analysis indicated that the four threshold measures contained independent information and that these independent dimensions were each correlated with glaucoma severity (p < 0.0015).
CONCLUSION: Combining the VEP and Psyc thresholds appeared to improve diagnostic power. Canonical correlation analysis indicated that they measured statistically independent aspects of glaucoma possibly related to disease severity. Adding the 20-s psychophysical test to a VEP test produced a significant benefit for a small time cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615592     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-014-9428-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  27 in total

1.  Contrast-response functions of the multifocal steady-state VEP (MSV).

Authors:  S N Abdullah; M Y Boon; T Maddess
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity measured with transient VEP: comparison with psychophysics and evidence of multiple mechanisms.

Authors:  Givago S Souza; Bruno D Gomes; Cézar A Saito; Manoel da Silva Filho; Luiz Carlos L Silveira
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Multifocal pupillographic visual field testing in glaucoma.

Authors:  Ted Maddess; Suzanne M Bedford; Xin-Lin Goh; Andrew C James
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Pattern-evoked potentials and optic nerve fiber loss in monocular laser-induced glaucoma.

Authors:  M A Johnson; B A Drum; H A Quigley; R M Sanchez; G R Dunkelberger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities.

Authors:  D C Burr; J Ross
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Signs of early damage in glaucomatous monkey eyes: low spatial frequency losses in the pattern ERG and VEP.

Authors:  M S Marx; S M Podos; I Bodis-Wollner; P Y Lee; R F Wang; C Severin
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Glaucoma affects steady state VEP contrast thresholds before psychophysics.

Authors:  Anmar M A Rahman; Gordon F Sanderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma.

Authors:  A Atkin; I Bodis-Wollner; M Wolkstein; A Moss; S M Podos
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  2 in total

1.  Visual impairment in an optineurin mouse model of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Henry C Tseng; Thorfinn T Riday; Celia McKee; Catherine E Braine; Howard Bomze; Ian Barak; Carrie Marean-Reardon; Simon W M John; Benjamin D Philpot; Michael D Ehlers
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Evaluation of the Radiation Dose-Volume Effects of Optic Nerves and Chiasm by Psychophysical, Electrophysiologic Tests, and Optical Coherence Tomography in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ozlem Ozkaya Akagunduz; Suzan Guven Yilmaz; Deniz Yalman; Berna Yuce; Elif Demirkilinc Biler; Filiz Afrashi; Mustafa Esassolak
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.