Literature DB >> 22445277

Contrast-response functions of the multifocal steady-state VEP (MSV).

S N Abdullah1, M Y Boon, T Maddess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure contrast-response functions (CRFs) for 9 visual field (VF) regions and nonlinear interactions between regions using a multifocal steady-state VEP (MSV).
METHODS: Ten normal adults were tested (51.7 ± 16.9 yr, 5 females). Stimuli resembling those of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter were presented in 9 VF regions simultaneously, which were modulated at incommensurate temporal frequencies (mean 19.7 Hz). Responses were recorded to 11 contrasts from 3% to 89%, using 8 scalp electrodes. Two repeats of a 20s duration stimulus were averaged for each contrast.
RESULTS: The CRFs were log-linear except for a depression near 7% contrast (p=0.0008), which was prominent in the central VF. The effects of VF region, stimulus frequency and recording electrode were significant (all p<0.016). Significant responses at frequencies corresponding to interactions between VF regions also appeared. Electrodes that were best for the interactions and second harmonic responses differed, suggesting different cortical sources.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite short recording durations the saturating CRFs meant that significant responses could be measured to low contrasts, and be distinguished from nonlinear interactions. SIGNIFICANCE: Recording MSVs to low contrast FDT-like stimuli might be useful for quantifying damage by glaucoma and other visual disorders.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22445277     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.02.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  8 in total

1.  Steady-state multifocal visual evoked potential (ssmfVEP) using dartboard stimulation as a possible tool for objective visual field assessment.

Authors:  Folkert K Horn; Franziska Selle; Bettina Hohberger; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Objective and quantitative assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity based on steady-state motion visual evoked potentials using concentric-ring paradigm.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Yunyun Wang; Chengcheng Han; Chenghang Du; Wenqaing Yan; Sicong Zhang; Renghao Liang
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Detecting Glaucoma With a Portable Brain-Computer Interface for Objective Assessment of Visual Function Loss.

Authors:  Masaki Nakanishi; Yu-Te Wang; Tzyy-Ping Jung; John K Zao; Yu-Yi Chien; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Fabio B Daga; Yuan-Pin Lin; Yijun Wang; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Visual evoked potential and psychophysical contrast thresholds in glaucoma.

Authors:  Siti Nurliyana Abdullah; Gordon F Sanderson; Andrew C James; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Central and peripheral steady-state visual evoked potentials in children with optic pathway gliomas.

Authors:  Sarah Zakaib Rassi; Luis H Ospina; Ariane Bochereau; Yvan Samson; Sébastien Perreault; Dave Saint-Amour
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  A frequency-tagging electrophysiological method to identify central and peripheral visual field deficits.

Authors:  Noémie Hébert-Lalonde; Lionel Carmant; Dima Safi; Marie-Sylvie Roy; Maryse Lassonde; Dave Saint-Amour
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials Elicited by Multifrequency Pattern-Reversal Stimulation.

Authors:  Bettina Hohberger; Jan Kremers; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Visual evoked cortical potential (VECP) elicited by sinusoidal gratings controlled by pseudo-random stimulation.

Authors:  Carolina S Araújo; Givago S Souza; Bruno D Gomes; Luiz Carlos L Silveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.