Literature DB >> 19788664

Multifocal pupillographic visual field testing in glaucoma.

Ted Maddess1, Suzanne M Bedford, Xin-Lin Goh, Andrew C James.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This preliminary study investigated a means of concurrently assessing the visual field defects of both eyes by recording pupillary responses to multifocal stimuli.
METHODS: Twenty normal subjects and 26 primary open angle glaucoma patients, age and sex matched, were examined by slit-lamp, Humphrey Field Analyser II achromatic 24-2 perimetry and fundus photography. The patients had moderate to severe fields in at least one eye. Two stereoscopically arranged displays presented an array of 24 stimulus regions per eye extending from fixation to 30 degrees eccentricity. Pupil responses were recorded by video cameras under infrared illumination. Four stimulus conditions were tested: each stimulus region containing either a single or a 2 x 2 array of patches, presented either steadily for 133 ms or flickered at 15 Hz for 266 ms. Mean presentation rate was 1/s/region. The 4-min duration stimuli were presented in 8 segments of 30 s. Segments did not need to be repeated unless more than 15% of a segment record was lost as a result of blinks or fixation losses.
RESULTS: The 48 stimuli produced 96 direct and consensual responses per subject. The single patch, non-flickered stimulus condition produced the best diagnostic performance, an area under the curve of 84%. The contraction amplitudes for that stimulus gave a median z-score of 3.2.
CONCLUSIONS: The method produced diagnostic accuracy approaching that of automated perimetry, but unlike perimetry provides standard errors for every point in each field as well as information on response delay and efferent defects. Only one pupil needs to function to measure both visual fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19788664     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02107.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  17 in total

1.  [Current state of pupil-based diagnostics for glaucomatous optic neuropathy].

Authors:  K Skorkovská; U Schiefer; B Wilhelm; H Wilhelm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Multifocal pupillography identifies retinal dysfunction in early age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Rohan W Essex; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Accuracy of pupil assessment for the detection of glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dolly S Chang; Li Xu; Michael V Boland; David S Friedman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Visual evoked potential and psychophysical contrast thresholds in glaucoma.

Authors:  Siti Nurliyana Abdullah; Gordon F Sanderson; Andrew C James; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Recovery dynamics of multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry from tropicamide dilation.

Authors:  Bhim Bahadur Rai; Faran Sabeti; Corinne F Carle; Emilie M F Rohan; Özge Saraç; Joshua van Kleef; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Refined Frequency Doubling Perimetry Analysis Reaffirms Central Nervous System Control of Chronic Glaucomatous Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Matthew A Reilly; Analaura Villarreal; Ted Maddess; William Eric Sponsel
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Assessing migraine patients with multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry.

Authors:  Eman N Ali; Corinne F Carle; Christian J Lueck; Maria Kolic; Ted Maddess
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Comparing multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) in retinal diseases.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Corinne F Carle; Rohan W Essex; Andrew Bell; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Objective Measurement of Local Rod and Cone Function Using Gaze-Controlled Chromatic Pupil Campimetry in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Carina Kelbsch; Katarina Stingl; Melanie Kempf; Torsten Strasser; Ronja Jung; Laura Kuehlewein; Helmut Wilhelm; Tobias Peters; Barbara Wilhelm; Krunoslav Stingl
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Gaze-Contingent Flicker Pupil Perimetry Detects Scotomas in Patients With Cerebral Visual Impairments or Glaucoma.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Carlien Roelofzen; Alessio Fracasso; Douwe P Bergsma; Mies van Genderen; Giorgio L Porro; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.