Literature DB >> 24615404

[Hands-on teaching for students in urology: the use of peer teaching and simulators].

S C Schmid1, P O Berberat, J E Gschwend, M E Autenrieth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hands-on training in urology for medical students is characterized by several challenges. We tried to improve our practical training day using peer teaching/peer-assisted learning and simulators.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An average of 116 students participated in our practical training day every semester between 2007/2008 and summer semester 2011. We evaluated students' satisfaction, human resources, and student to teacher ratio before and after the restructuring.
RESULTS: After the restructuring in 2008/2009, all categories showed improvement (1=best; 6=worst). The general rating rose from 2.2 (2008) to 1.45 (2011); practical training improved from 2.85 (2008) to 1.55 (2011). DISCUSSION: Peer teaching and simulators are reasonable tools in medical education in urology. They increase individual coaching of students and lead to improved satisfaction and subjective learning success. Interprofessional education with the selective use of nursing staff as teachers was widely accepted. With these tools essential hands-on skills in urology can be acquired by all medical students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615404     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3435-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  14 in total

1.  A comprehensive student peer-teaching program.

Authors:  M R Ebbert; P M Morgan; I B Harris
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Outcomes of the gross and developmental anatomy teaching assistant experience.

Authors:  Joseph J Ocel; Brian A Palmer; Christopher M Wittich; Stephen W Carmichael; Wojciech Pawlina
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 3.  How important are role models in making good doctors?

Authors:  Elisabeth Paice; Shelley Heard; Fiona Moss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-28

4.  An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials.

Authors:  Tracey Papinczak; Louise Young; Michele Groves; Michele Haynes
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance of elementary school children.

Authors:  H E Pigott; J W Fantuzzo; P W Clement
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1986

6.  Evaluation of a basic science, peer tutorial program for first- and second-year medical students.

Authors:  F M Trevino; D C Eiland
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1980-11

Review 7.  The utility of simulation in medical education: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Yasuharu Okuda; Ethan O Bryson; Samuel DeMaria; Lisa Jacobson; Joshua Quinones; Bing Shen; Adam I Levine
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2009-08

Review 8.  A systematic review of medical skills laboratory training: where to from here?

Authors:  Marita Lynagh; Robert Burton; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Helping each other to learn--a process evaluation of peer assisted learning.

Authors:  Liam G Glynn; Anne MacFarlane; Maureen Kelly; Peter Cantillon; Andrew W Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors' skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching.

Authors:  Sharon Buckley; Javier Zamora
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  2 in total

1.  Peer-assisted learning versus didactic teaching in osteology for first-year Indian undergraduate medical students: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Lakshmi Trikkur Anantharaman; Yogitha Ravindranath; Stephen Dayal; Nachiket Shankar
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  [New approbation regulations-new concepts in urological undergraduate training?]

Authors:  C Siech; J König; L A Kluth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.