Literature DB >> 17885964

An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials.

Tracey Papinczak1, Louise Young, Michele Groves, Michele Haynes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore self-, peer-, and tutor assessment of performance in tutorials among first year medical students in a problem-based learning curriculum.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five students enrolled in the first year of the Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery Program at the University of Queensland were recruited to participate in a study of metacognition and peer- and self-assessment. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected from the assessment of PBL performance within the tutorial setting, which included elements such as responsibility and respect, communication, and critical analysis through presentation of a case summary. Self-, peer-, and tutor assessment took place concurrently.
RESULTS: Scores obtained from tutor assessment correlated poorly with self-assessment ratings (r = 0.31-0.41), with students consistently under-marking their own performance to a substantial degree. Students with greater self-efficacy, scored their PBL performance more highly. Peer-assessment was a slightly more accurate measure, with peer-averaged scores correlating moderately with tutor ratings initially (r = 0.40) and improving over time (r = 0.60). Students consistently over-marked their peers, particularly those with sceptical attitudes to the peer-assessment process. Peer over-marking led to less divergence from the tutor scoring than under-marking of one's own work.
CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, first-year medical students in a problem-based learning curriculum were better able to accurately judge the performance of their peers compared to their own performance. This study has shown that self-assessment of process is not an accurate measure, in line with the majority of research in this domain. Nevertheless, it has an important role to play in supporting the development of skills in reflection and self-awareness.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17885964     DOI: 10.1080/01421590701294323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  28 in total

1.  Report of the 2010-2011 Academic Affairs Standing Committee.

Authors:  Holly L Mason; Mitra Assemi; Bethanne Brown; Jeff J Cain; Wendy C Cox; Stephen J Cutler; Vern K Duba; Evan T Robinson; Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Medical Students' Perceptions of Peer Assessment in a Problem-based Learning Curriculum.

Authors:  Yasin I Tayem; Henry James; Khalid A J Al-Khaja; Rima L A Razzak; Bhagath K Potu; Reginald P Sequeira
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-08-24

3.  Multiple rubric-based assessments of student case presentations.

Authors:  Catherine E O'Brien; Amy M Franks; Cindy D Stowe
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  [Skills lab from the surgical point of view. Experiences from the Magdeburg Medical School--The University of Magdeburg].

Authors:  K Reschke; K Werwick; L Mersson; K Clasen; D Urbach; H J Haß; F Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Intergroup peer assessment in problem-based learning tutorials for undergraduate pharmacy students.

Authors:  Vicky S Kritikos; Jim Woulfe; Maria B Sukkar; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  [Hands-on teaching for students in urology: the use of peer teaching and simulators].

Authors:  S C Schmid; P O Berberat; J E Gschwend; M E Autenrieth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Accuracy and reliability of peer assessment of athletic training psychomotor laboratory skills.

Authors:  Melissa C Marty; Jolene M Henning; John T Willse
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Perceptions of Australian and Malaysian Educators in an Undergraduate Pharmacy Program on Case-based Learning.

Authors:  Sabrina Anne Jacob; Ong Hui Dhing; Daniel Malone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Hybrid simulation compared to manikin alone in teaching pelvic examinations: a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Kristyn Manley; Sian Edwards; Jane Mears; Dimitrios Siassakos
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2016-02-01

10.  Students and tutors' social representations of assessment in problem-based learning tutorials supporting change.

Authors:  Valdes R Bollela; Manoel H C Gabarra; Caetano da Costa; Rita C P Lima
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.