Literature DB >> 24614948

Effect of age and other factors on macular pigment optical density measured with resonance Raman spectroscopy.

Akira Obana1, Yuko Gohto, Masaki Tanito, Shigetoshi Okazaki, Werner Gellermann, Paul S Bernstein, Akihiro Ohira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Macular pigment is a defense system against phototoxic damage of the retina by visible light. It is still under debate whether or not macular pigment optical density (MPOD) levels decline with age, because the age effect varied depending on the technique used to measure MPOD levels. Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) is an objective method to measure MPOD, and studies using RRS showed a drastic age-related decline of MPOD levels; however, since RRS measurements are influenced by cataracts, it has been argued that the age-related decline of RRS measurements is an artifact from lens changes in aged subjects. In the present study, MPOD levels were measured with RRS in pseudophakic eyes, and the effects of age and other factors on MPOD levels were investigated.
METHODS: The subjects included 144 patients with no fundus disorders who received cataract surgery with untinted intraocular lens implantation. MPOD levels were measured in 144 eyes using integral RRS 1 day post surgery. Factors potentially associated with MPOD levels such as age, gender, smoking habits, body mass index, diabetes, glaucoma, axial length, pupil diameter, spherical equivalent refractive error, and foveal thickness were examined by multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: The macular pigment RRS levels ranged from 776 to 11,815 Raman counts, with an average level of 4,375 ± 1,917 (standard deviation [SD]) Raman counts. Multiple regression analysis revealed that age and axial length were significantly correlated with low MPOD values (regression coefficient of -59 for age and -404 for axial length, respectively). No significant correlations were observed for other factors.
CONCLUSIONS: After removing the potentially confounding effect of age-related lens yellowing on the RRS measurements, age remained a significant patient parameter for lowered MPOD levels. MPOD levels were found to decline by more than 10 % each decade. Axial length was also a negative predictor of MPOD levels. Since the present study included only patients aged 50 years and older, the effects of age and other factors on MPOD levels for younger subjects remain unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24614948     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2574-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  41 in total

1.  A portable instrument for measuring macular pigment with central fixation.

Authors:  J Mellerio; S Ahmadi-Lari; F van Kuijk; D Pauleikhoff; A Bird; J Marshall
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.424

2.  Macular pigment density in healthy subjects quantified with a modified confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Henrike Wüstemeyer; Andreas Moessner; Cornelia Jahn; Sebastian Wolf
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Macular pigment and percentage of body fat.

Authors:  John Nolan; Orla O'Donovan; Heather Kavanagh; Jim Stack; Michael Harrison; Annalouise Muldoon; John Mellerio; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  In vivo macular pigment measurements: a comparison of resonance Raman spectroscopy and heterochromatic flicker photometry.

Authors:  R E Hogg; R S Anderson; M R Stevenson; M B Zlatkova; U Chakravarthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Macular pigment and ocular biometry.

Authors:  Kumari Neelam; John Nolan; Edward Loane; Jim Stack; Orla O'Donovan; Kah Guan Au Eong; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Aging and human macular pigment density. Appended with translations from the work of Max Schultze and Ewald Hering.

Authors:  J S Werner; S K Donnelly; R Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The spatial distribution of macular pigment in humans.

Authors:  S F Chen; Y Chang; J C Wu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.424

8.  Color matching in diabetes: optical density of the crystalline lens and macular pigments.

Authors:  Nigel Philip Davies; Antony Bryan Morland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Risk factors for age-related maculopathy are associated with a relative lack of macular pigment.

Authors:  John M Nolan; Jim Stack; Orla O' Donovan; Edward Loane; Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Macular carotenoid levels of normal subjects and age-related maculopathy patients in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Akira Obana; Tadahisa Hiramitsu; Yuko Gohto; Akihiro Ohira; Satoshi Mizuno; Toru Hirano; Paul S Bernstein; Hisako Fujii; Ken Iseki; Masaki Tanito; Yoshihiro Hotta
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  9 in total

1.  Factors affecting macular pigment optical density.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kawada
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Spatial distribution of macular pigment estimated by autofluorescence imaging in elderly Japanese individuals.

Authors:  Akira Obana; Yuko Gohto; Hiroyuki Sasano; Werner Gellermann; Mohsen Sharifzadeh; Takahiko Seto; Paul S Bernstein
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Bayer Filter Snapshot Hyperspectral Fundus Camera for Human Retinal Imaging.

Authors:  Joel Kaluzny; Hao Li; Wenzhong Liu; Peter Nesper; Justin Park; Hao F Zhang; Amani A Fawzi
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 4.  Lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin: The basic and clinical science underlying carotenoid-based nutritional interventions against ocular disease.

Authors:  Paul S Bernstein; Binxing Li; Preejith P Vachali; Aruna Gorusupudi; Rajalekshmy Shyam; Bradley S Henriksen; John M Nolan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  The Effect of BCMO1 Gene Variants on Macular Pigment Optical Density in Young Healthy Caucasians.

Authors:  Zachary Kyle-Little; Andrew J Zele; C Phillip Morris; Beatrix Feigl
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2014-12-04

6.  Investigating the potential of Zernike polynomials to characterise spatial distribution of macular pigment.

Authors:  Piers Allen; Antonio Calcagni; Anthony G Robson; Ela Claridge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of Macular Pigment Optical Density in Glaucoma Patients and Healthy Subjects - A Prospective Diagnostic Study.

Authors:  Yannick Bruns; Bernd Junker; Daniel Boehringer; Carsten Framme; Amelie Pielen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 8.  Raman fingerprints as promising markers of cellular senescence and aging.

Authors:  Lisa Liendl; Johannes Grillari; Markus Schosserer
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 7.713

9.  Correlation between Macular Pigment Optical Density and Neural Thickness and Volume of the Retina.

Authors:  Norihiro Nagai; Teru Asato; Sakiko Minami; Misa Suzuki; Hajime Shinoda; Toshihide Kurihara; Hideki Sonobe; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Atsuro Uchida; Norimitsu Ban; Kazuo Tsubota; Yoko Ozawa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.