Literature DB >> 24613537

Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos.

Francesco Fiorentino1, Anil Biricik2, Sara Bono2, Letizia Spizzichino2, Ettore Cotroneo2, Giuliano Cottone2, Felix Kokocinski3, Claude-Edouard Michel3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening and to investigate its applicability to preimplantation genetic screening (PGS).
DESIGN: Retrospective blinded study.
SETTING: Reference laboratory. PATIENT(S): Karyotypically defined chromosomally abnormal single cells and whole-genome amplification (WGA) products, previously analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH), selected from 68 clinical PGS cycles with embryos biopsied at cleavage stage. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Consistency of NGS-based diagnosis of aneuploidy compared with either conventional karyotyping of single cells or array-CGH diagnoses of single blastomeres. RESULT(S): Eighteen single cells and 190 WGA products from single blastomeres, were blindly evaluated with the NGS-based protocol. In total, 4,992 chromosomes were assessed, 402 of which carried a copy number imbalance. NGS specificity for aneuploidy call (consistency of chromosome copy number assignment) was 99.98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.88%-100%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 99.08%-100%). NGS specificity for aneuploid embryo call (24-chromosome diagnosis consistency) was 100% (95% CI 94.59%-100%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 97.39%-100%). CONCLUSION(S): This is the first study reporting extensive preclinical validation and accuracy assessment of NGS-based comprehensive aneuploidy screening on single cells. Given the high level of consistency with an established methodology, such as array-CGH, NGS has demonstrated a robust high-throughput methodology ready for clinical application in reproductive medicine, with potential advantages of reduced costs and enhanced precision.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comprehensive chromosome screening; array comparative genomic hybridization; embryo aneuploidy; next-generation sequencing; preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24613537     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  53 in total

1.  Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes diminishes embryo development potential before but not after embryo genomic activation.

Authors:  Yijuan Sun; Ruihuan Gu; Xiaowei Lu; Shen Zhao; Yun Feng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Clinical application of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  Wenke Zhang; Ying Liu; Li Wang; Hui Wang; Minyue Ma; Mengnan Xu; Xiaofei Xu; ZhiYing Gao; Jinliang Duan; David S Cram; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Berhan Bogale; Yaqiong Tang; Sijia Lu; Xiaoliang Sunney Xie; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Next-generation molecular diagnosis: single-cell sequencing from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Wanjun Zhu; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Sadie L Marjani; Jialing Zhang; Wengeng Zhang; Shixiu Wu; Xinghua Pan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Robust high-performance nanoliter-volume single-cell multiple displacement amplification on planar substrates.

Authors:  Kaston Leung; Anders Klaus; Bill K Lin; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Daniel Lai; Ali Bashashati; Yi-Fei Huang; Radhouane Aniba; Michelle Moksa; Adi Steif; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Martin Hirst; Sohrab P Shah; Samuel Aparicio; Carl L Hansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Claire E Beyer; E Willats
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Authors:  Lina Lu; Bo Lv; Kevin Huang; Zhigang Xue; Xianmin Zhu; Guoping Fan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Prediction of a rare chromosomal aberration simultaneously with next generation sequencing-based comprehensive chromosome screening in human preimplantation embryos for recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Yi-Xuan Lee; Chien-Wen Chen; Yi-Hui Lin; Chii-Ruey Tzeng; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening by comprehensive molecular testing.

Authors:  Hiroki Kurahashi; Takema Kato; Jun Miyazaki; Haruki Nishizawa; Eiji Nishio; Hiroshi Furukawa; Hironori Miyamura; Mayuko Ito; Toshiaki Endo; Yuya Ouchi; Hidehito Inagaki; Takuma Fujii
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-14

10.  Euploid rates among oocyte donors: is there an optimal age for donation?

Authors:  Luis R Hoyos; Connie Y Cheng; Kathleen Brennan; Gary Hubert; Brandon Wang; Richard P Buyalos; Molly Quinn; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.