Literature DB >> 29259418

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening by comprehensive molecular testing.

Hiroki Kurahashi1,2, Takema Kato1, Jun Miyazaki1,3, Haruki Nishizawa3, Eiji Nishio3, Hiroshi Furukawa4, Hironori Miyamura3, Mayuko Ito3, Toshiaki Endo5, Yuya Ouchi2, Hidehito Inagaki1,2, Takuma Fujii3.   

Abstract

Although embryo screening by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become the standard technique for the treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss in couples with a balanced gross chromosomal rearrangement, the implantation and pregnancy rates of PGD using conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remain suboptimal. Comprehensive molecular testing, such as array comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing, can improve these rates, but amplification bias in the whole genome amplification method remains an obstacle to accurate diagnosis. Recent advances in amplification procedures combined with improvements in the microarray platform and analytical method have overcome the amplification bias, and the data accuracy of the comprehensive PGD method has reached the level of clinical laboratory testing. Currently, comprehensive PGD is also applied to recurrent pregnancy loss due to recurrent fetal aneuploidy or infertility with recurrent implantation failure, known as preimplantation genetic screening. However, there are still numerous problems to be solved, including misdiagnosis due to somatic mosaicism, cell cycle-related background noise, and difficulty in diagnosis of polyploidy. The technology for comprehensive PGD also requires further improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microarray; Next‐generation sequencing; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Translocation

Year:  2015        PMID: 29259418      PMCID: PMC5715840          DOI: 10.1007/s12522-015-0216-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Med Biol        ISSN: 1445-5781


  49 in total

Review 1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; André Van Steirteghem; Inge Liebaers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  SMC1beta-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction.

Authors:  Craig A Hodges; Ekaterina Revenkova; Rolf Jessberger; Terry J Hassold; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-10-30       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos.

Authors:  A Mertzanidou; L Wilton; J Cheng; C Spits; E Vanneste; Y Moreau; J R Vermeesch; K Sermon
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XII: cycles from January to December 2009 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2010.

Authors:  C Moutou; V Goossens; E Coonen; M De Rycke; G Kokkali; P Renwick; S B SenGupta; K Vesela; J Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos in culture and implications for stem cell production.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Esther Velilla; Pere Colls; Mercedez Garcia Bermudez; Mohan C Vemuri; Nury Steuerwald; John Garrisi; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  FISH analysis on day 5 post-insemination of human arrested and blastocyst stage embryos.

Authors:  P Ruangvutilert; J D Delhanty; P Serhal; M Simopoulou; C H Rodeck; J C Harper
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure.

Authors:  L Voullaire; L Wilton; J McBain; T Callaghan; R Williamson
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Dong Gui Hu; Graham Webb; Nicole Hussey
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH.

Authors:  Cedric Le Caignec; Claudia Spits; Karen Sermon; Martine De Rycke; Bernard Thienpont; Sophie Debrock; Catherine Staessen; Yves Moreau; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Andre Van Steirteghem; Inge Liebaers; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The accuracy of chromosomal microarray testing for identification of embryonic mosaicism in human blastocysts.

Authors:  Veronica Novik; Emily B Moulton; Michael E Sisson; Shagun L Shrestha; Khoa D Tran; Harvey J Stern; Brian D Mariani; Wayne S Stanley
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does ICSI for in vitro fertilization cause more aneuploid embryos?

Authors:  Xiangli Niu; Jiamin Long; Fangqiang Gong; Weihua Wang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.009

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.