Literature DB >> 31235575

Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy.

Lei Huang1,2, Berhan Bogale2, Yaqiong Tang3,4, Sijia Lu5, Xiaoliang Sunney Xie6,3,4, Catherine Racowsky7.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy is widely applied in in vitro fertilization (IVF) to identify aneuploid embryos. However, potential safety concerns regarding biopsy and restrictions to only those embryos suitable for biopsy pose limitations. In addition, embryo mosaicism gives rise to false positives and false negatives in PGT-A because the inner cell mass (ICM) cells, which give rise to the fetus, are not tested. Here, we report a critical examination of the efficacy of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) in the spent culture media of human blastocysts by analyzing the cell-free DNA, which reflects ploidy of both the TE and ICM. Fifty-two frozen donated blastocysts with TE biopsy results were thawed; each of their spent culture medium was collected after 24-h culture and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). niPGT-A and TE-biopsy PGT-A results were compared with the sequencing results of the corresponding embryos, which were taken as true results for aneuploidy reporting. With removal of all corona-cumulus cells, the false-negative rate (FNR) for niPGT-A was found to be zero. By applying an appropriate threshold for mosaicism, both the positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity for niPGT-A were much higher than TE-biopsy PGT-A. Furthermore, the concordance rates for both embryo ploidy and chromosome copy numbers were higher for niPGT-A than TE-biopsy PGT-A. These results suggest that niPGT-A is less prone to errors associated with embryo mosaicism and is more reliable than TE-biopsy PGT-A.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICSI; culture medium; human blastocyst; noninvasive PGT-A; preimplantation genetic testing

Year:  2019        PMID: 31235575      PMCID: PMC6628824          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1907472116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  43 in total

1.  Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data.

Authors:  Adam B Olshen; E S Venkatraman; Robert Lucito; Michael Wigler
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum. Recent developments.

Authors:  Peter B Gahan; R Swaminathan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Kathleen M Upham; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Danny D Daphnis; N-Neka Goodall; Anastasia Mania; Tracey Griffiths; Anthony Gordon; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Apoptosis in the human embryo.

Authors:  K Hardy
Journal:  Rev Reprod       Date:  1999-09

6.  Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell.

Authors:  Chenghang Zong; Sijia Lu; Alec R Chapman; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts.

Authors:  L E Northrop; N R Treff; B Levy; R T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Kathleen M Upham; Eric J Forman; Tian Zhao; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates.

Authors:  E J Forman; X Tao; K M Ferry; D Taylor; N R Treff; R T Scott
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  33 in total

1.  Not even noninvasive cell-free DNA can rescue preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; David H Barad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reply to Gleicher and Barad: Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing may provide the solution to the problem of embryo mosaicism.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Sijia Lu; Catherine Racowsky; X Sunney Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Yan Hao; Nagwa Elshewy; Xiaoqian Zhu; Zhiguo Zhang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  New perspectives with the use of noninvasive chromosome screening (NICS) in ART.

Authors:  José G Franco
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-10-14

Review 5.  From contemplation to classification of chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Igor N Lebedev; Daria I Zhigalina
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Conditions: Is Cell-Free DNA Testing the Next Step?

Authors:  Deirdre Zander-Fox; Tristan Hardy; Alice Rogers; Melody Menezes; Stefan C Kane
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 7.  The unknown human trophectoderm: implication for biopsy at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Angelo Tocci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Cell-free DNA discoveries in human reproductive medicine: providing a new tool for biomarker and genetic assays in ART.

Authors:  Maryam Qasemi; Reza Mahdian; Fardin Amidi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data.

Authors:  Diego Marin; Jia Xu; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Diagnostic efficiency of blastocyst culture medium in noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Jingbo Chen; Lei Jia; Tingting Li; Yingchun Guo; Shujing He; Zhiqiang Zhang; Wenlong Su; Shihui Zhang; Cong Fang
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.