Literature DB >> 31196935

Radiation Force as a Physical Mechanism for Ultrasonic Neurostimulation of the Ex Vivo Retina.

Mike D Menz1, Patrick Ye2, Kamyar Firouzi3, Amin Nikoozadeh3, Kim Butts Pauly4, Pierre Khuri-Yakub5, Stephen A Baccus6.   

Abstract

Focused ultrasound has been shown to be effective at stimulating neurons in many animal models, both in vivo and ex vivo Ultrasonic neuromodulation is the only noninvasive method of stimulation that could reach deep in the brain with high spatial-temporal resolution, and thus has potential for use in clinical applications and basic studies of the nervous system. Understanding the physical mechanism by which energy in a high acoustic frequency wave is delivered to stimulate neurons will be important to optimize this technology. We imaged the isolated salamander retina of either sex during ultrasonic stimuli that drive ganglion cell activity and observed micron scale displacements, consistent with radiation force, the nonlinear delivery of momentum by a propagating wave. We recorded ganglion cell spiking activity and changed the acoustic carrier frequency across a broad range (0.5-43 MHz), finding that increased stimulation occurs at higher acoustic frequencies, ruling out cavitation as an alternative possible mechanism. A quantitative radiation force model can explain retinal responses and could potentially explain previous in vivo results in the mouse, suggesting a new hypothesis to be tested in vivo Finally, we found that neural activity was strongly modulated by the distance between the transducer and the electrode array showing the influence of standing waves on the response. We conclude that radiation force is the dominant physical mechanism underlying ultrasonic neurostimulation in the ex vivo retina and propose that the control of standing waves is a new potential method to modulate these effects.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Ultrasonic neurostimulation is a promising noninvasive technology that has potential for both basic research and clinical applications. The mechanisms of ultrasonic neurostimulation are unknown, making it difficult to optimize in any given application. We studied the physical mechanism by which ultrasound is converted into an effective energy form to cause neurostimulation in the retina and find that ultrasound acts via radiation force leading to a mechanical displacement of tissue. We further show that standing waves have a strong modulatory effect on activity. Our quantitative model by which ultrasound generates radiation force and leads to neural activity will be important in optimizing ultrasonic neurostimulation across a wide range of applications.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neurostimulation; radiation force; retina; ultrasonic; ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31196935      PMCID: PMC6687898          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2394-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  55 in total

1.  Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits.

Authors:  Yusuf Tufail; Alexei Matyushov; Nathan Baldwin; Monica L Tauchmann; Joseph Georges; Anna Yoshihiro; Stephen I Helms Tillery; William J Tyler
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The impact of standing wave effects on transcranial focused ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier in a rat model.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Yuexi Huang; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Mechanosensitive channels: what can they do and how do they do it?

Authors:  Elizabeth S Haswell; Rob Phillips; Douglas C Rees
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Mechanisms of mechanotransduction.

Authors:  A Wayne Orr; Brian P Helmke; Brett R Blackman; Martin A Schwartz
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 5.  Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

Authors:  William D O'Brien
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS.

Authors:  Yun-Bi Lu; Kristian Franze; Gerald Seifert; Christian Steinhäuser; Frank Kirchhoff; Hartwig Wolburg; Jochen Guck; Paul Janmey; Er-Qing Wei; Josef Käs; Andreas Reichenbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: nonthermal mechanisms.

Authors:  Charles C Church; Edwin L Carstensen; Wesley L Nyborg; Paul L Carson; Leon A Frizzell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young's modulus for soft biological tissues.

Authors:  Clayton T McKee; Julie A Last; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Authors:  Boris Krasovitski; Victor Frenkel; Shy Shoham; Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  William J Tyler; Yusuf Tufail; Michael Finsterwald; Monica L Tauchmann; Emily J Olson; Cassondra Majestic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  Ultrasound neuromodulation: mechanisms and the potential of multimodal stimulation for neuronal function assessment.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Allegra Conti; Nicola Toschi; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-05-26

2.  Displacement Imaging for Focused Ultrasound Peripheral Nerve Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Stephen A Lee; Hermes A S Kamimura; Mark T Burgess; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Radiomics-Informed Modeling for Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation: Age Matters.

Authors:  Hanna Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  The Inhibitory Thermal Effects of Focused Ultrasound on an Identified, Single Motoneuron.

Authors:  Morgan N Collins; Wynn Legon; Karen A Mesce
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-30

5.  Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Noninvasive Neuromodulation of the Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Gengxi Lu; Xuejun Qian; Johnny Castillo; Runze Li; Laiming Jiang; Haotian Lu; K Kirk Shung; Mark S Humayun; Biju B Thomas; Qifa Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Effective Ultrasonic Stimulation in Human Peripheral Nervous System.

Authors:  Thomas Riis; Jan Kubanek
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 7.  Ultrasonic Retinal Neuromodulation and Acoustic Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Pei-An Lo; Kyana Huang; Qifa Zhou; Mark S Humayun; Lan Yue
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Acoustic Waves in Axonal Membrane and Caveolins are the New Targets for Pain Treatment with High Frequency Ultrasound.

Authors:  Ilja Kruglikov
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Ultrasound neuromodulation depends on pulse repetition frequency and can modulate inhibitory effects of TTX.

Authors:  Thomas J Manuel; Jiro Kusunose; Xiaoyan Zhan; Xiaohui Lv; Ellison Kang; Aaron Yang; Zixiu Xiang; Charles F Caskey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation and the Confounds of Intracellular Electrophysiological Investigation.

Authors:  Morgan N Collins; Karen A Mesce
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.