Literature DB >> 15101589

Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.

Marcos M Naconecy1, Eduardo R Teixeira, Rosemary S A Shinkai, Luis Carlos F Frasca, André Cervieri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the deformation of a metallic framework connected to 15 stone casts fabricated using 3 transfer techniques to determine the most accurate impression procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five stone casts were made from polyether impressions of an epoxy resin master model for each transfer technique. Group 1 samples were created by the direct splinted technique (square transfer copings splinted with carbon steel pins and autopolymerizing acrylic resin, custom tray); group 2 samples were made by the direct nonsplinted technique (square transfer copings, custom tray); and group 3 samples were fabricated using the indirect technique (tapered transfer copings, custom tray). Sixteen strain gauges were fixed on the framework to measure the degree of framework deformation for each stone cast. Pairs of strain gauges placed opposite each other constituted 1 channel to read deformation (half Wheatstone bridge). Deformation readings were collected at the 4 segments between abutments in 4 directions (anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior). Deformation data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Tukey test at the .05 and .01 levels of significance.
RESULTS: Group 1 samples allowed the most accurate reproduction of analog position compared to the samples made using the other techniques. No significant difference was found between the direct nonsplinted (group 2) and indirect (group 3) techniques. DISCUSSION: Although some studies have evaluated transfer techniques with similar methodology, this study demonstrated the most suitable strain gauge setup to record framework deformations in all directions and simultaneously offset the effects of temperature variation.
CONCLUSIONS: The direct splinted technique was the most accurate transfer method for multiple abutments compared to direct nonsplinted and indirect techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15101589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  An experimental and theoretical composite model of the human mandible.

Authors:  R De Santis; F Mollica; R Esposito; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

4.  Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.

Authors:  Maria Menini; Paolo Setti; Francesco Pera; Paolo Pera; Paolo Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Accuracy of a proposed implant impression technique using abutments and metal framework.

Authors:  Hyeok-Jae Lee; Young-Jun Lim; Chang-Whe Kim; Jung-Han Choi; Myung-Joo Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Clinical study evaluating the discrepancy of two different impression techniques of four implants in an edentulous jaw.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Arndt Happe; Markus Schlee; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Influence of prosthetic screw material on joint stability in passive and non-passive implant-supported dentures.

Authors:  Aloísio Oro Spazzin; Guilherme Elias Pessanha Henriques; Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo; Rafael Leonardo Xediek Consani; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Marcelo Ferraz Mesquita
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-12-30

8.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mansor Rismanchian; Badrosadat Dastgheib; Farshad Bajoghli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

10.  Dimensional accuracy of vinyl polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials in direct implant impression technique for multiple dental implants.

Authors:  Rohini Rajendran; N Gopi Chander; Kuttae Vishwanathan Anitha; Balasubramanian Muthukumar
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.