Literature DB >> 9197102

Tolerance measurements of various implant components.

T Ma1, J I Nicholls, J E Rubenstein.   

Abstract

Machining tolerance, an intrinsic characteristic that exists between machined implant components, identifies the amount of horizontal shift possible between paired components. Machining tolerances between implant components (abutment, gold, cylinder, impression coping, and brass abutment replicas) were measured with a coordinate measuring machine. The measured tolerances ranged from 22 to 100 microns. Machining tolerances between implant components should be included in future studies of accuracy, because it is an inherent characteristic of the component itself.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9197102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Kurt Erdelt; Jan-Frederik Güth; Arndt Happe; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

4.  Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions.

Authors:  Sang J Lee; Rebecca A Betensky; Grace E Gianneschi; German O Gallucci
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Si-Hoon Jo; Kyoung-Il Kim; Jae-Min Seo; Kwang-Yeob Song; Ju-Mi Park; Seung-Geun Ahn
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mansor Rismanchian; Badrosadat Dastgheib; Farshad Bajoghli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

7.  Effect of technique and impression material on the vertical misfit of a screw-retained, three-unit implant bridge: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Rajati Haghi; Masoud Shiehzadeh; Mohammadreza Nakhaei; Fatemeh Ahrary; Saeid Sabzevari
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

8.  A Comparison of implant impression precision: Different materials and techniques.

Authors:  Mahtab Tabesh; Marzieh Alikhasi; Hakimeh Siadat
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-02-01

9.  Evaluation of the effect of implant angulations and impression techniques on implant cast accuracy - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Aman Arora; Viram Upadhyaya; Kirti R Parashar; Divya Malik
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

10.  Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants.

Authors:  Mahroo Vojdani; Kianoosh Torabi; Elham Ansarifard
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.