Literature DB >> 24593808

Cognitive Load Theory: implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86.

John Q Young1, Jeroen Van Merrienboer, Steve Durning, Olle Ten Cate.   

Abstract

Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) builds upon established models of human memory that include the subsystems of sensory, working and long-term memory. Working memory (WM) can only process a limited number of information elements at any given time. This constraint creates a "bottleneck" for learning. CLT identifies three types of cognitive load that impact WM: intrinsic load (associated with performing essential aspects of the task), extraneous load (associated with non-essential aspects of the task) and germane load (associated with the deliberate use of cognitive strategies that facilitate learning). When the cognitive load associated with a task exceeds the learner's WM capacity, performance and learning is impaired. To facilitate learning, CLT researchers have developed instructional techniques that decrease extraneous load (e.g. worked examples), titrate intrinsic load to the developmental stage of the learner (e.g. simplify task without decontextualizing) and ensure that unused WM capacity is dedicated to germane load, i.e. cognitive learning strategies. A number of instructional techniques have been empirically tested. As learners' progress, curricula must also attend to the expertise-reversal effect. Instructional techniques that facilitate learning among early learners may not help and may even interfere with learning among more advanced learners. CLT has particular relevance to medical education because many of the professional activities to be learned require the simultaneous integration of multiple and varied sets of knowledge, skills and behaviors at a specific time and place. These activities possess high "element interactivity" and therefore impose a cognitive load that may surpass the WM capacity of the learner. Applications to various medical education settings (classroom, workplace and self-directed learning) are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24593808     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  100 in total

1.  Effect of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Stressors on Clinical Skills Performance in Third-Year Medical Students.

Authors:  Pierre Pottier; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Thomas Dejoie; Jean-Marie Castillo; Anne-Gaelle Le Loupp; Bernard Planchon; Angélique Bonnaud; Vicki LeBlanc
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Letter from America.

Authors:  John Frey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Cognitive load theory and teaching in primary care.

Authors:  Neel Sharma
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Effective Faculty Development in an Institutional Context: Designing for Transfer.

Authors:  Francois J Cilliers; Ara Tekian
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

5.  Clinical Reasoning: Talk the Talk or Just Walk the Walk?

Authors:  Gurpreet Dhaliwal; Jonathan Ilgen
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

Review 6.  The Psychology of Following Instructions and Its Implications.

Authors:  Sabrina Dunham; Edward Lee; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Videoconferencing: A Steep Learning Curve for Medical Educators.

Authors:  Andrea Smeraglio; Matthew DiVeronica; Christopher Terndrup; Bryn McGhee; Shona Hunsaker
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-10

8.  Digital and Social Media in Anatomy Education.

Authors:  Catherine M Hennessy; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  A graphical clinical decision aid for managing imaging report information.

Authors:  James C Boysen; Zacariah K Shannon; Yasmeen A Khan; Breanne M Wells; Robert D Vining
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-12-19

10.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.

Authors:  R D Dias; M C Ngo-Howard; M T Boskovski; M A Zenati; S J Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.