OBJECTIVE: Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) tends to return elevated estimates of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV). In this study, subject-specific calibration factors (CFs), based on steady-state CBV measurements, were applied to rescale the absolute level of DSC-MRI CBF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were scanned in a test-retest approach. Independent CBV measurements for calibration were accomplished using a T1-based contrast agent steady-state method (referred to as Bookend), as well as a blood-nulling vascular space occupancy (VASO) approach. Calibrated DSC-MRI was compared with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL). RESULTS: For segmented grey matter (GM) regions of interests (ROIs), pCASL-based CBF was 63 ± 11 ml/(min 100 g) (mean ± SD). Nominal CBF from non-calibrated DSC-MRI was 277 ± 61 ml/(min 100 g), while calibrations resulted in 56 ± 23 ml/(min 100 g) (Bookend) and 52 ± 16 ml/(min 100 g) (VASO). Calibration tended to eliminate the overestimation, although the repeatability was generally moderate and the correlation between calibrated DSC-MRI and pCASL was low (r < 0.25). However, using GM instead of WM ROIs for extraction of CFs resulted in improved repeatability. CONCLUSION: Both calibration approaches provided reasonable absolute levels of GM CBF, although the calibration methods suffered from low signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in weak repeatability and difficulties in showing high degrees of correlation with pCASL measurements.
OBJECTIVE: Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) tends to return elevated estimates of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV). In this study, subject-specific calibration factors (CFs), based on steady-state CBV measurements, were applied to rescale the absolute level of DSC-MRI CBF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were scanned in a test-retest approach. Independent CBV measurements for calibration were accomplished using a T1-based contrast agent steady-state method (referred to as Bookend), as well as a blood-nulling vascular space occupancy (VASO) approach. Calibrated DSC-MRI was compared with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL). RESULTS: For segmented grey matter (GM) regions of interests (ROIs), pCASL-based CBF was 63 ± 11 ml/(min 100 g) (mean ± SD). Nominal CBF from non-calibrated DSC-MRI was 277 ± 61 ml/(min 100 g), while calibrations resulted in 56 ± 23 ml/(min 100 g) (Bookend) and 52 ± 16 ml/(min 100 g) (VASO). Calibration tended to eliminate the overestimation, although the repeatability was generally moderate and the correlation between calibrated DSC-MRI and pCASL was low (r < 0.25). However, using GM instead of WM ROIs for extraction of CFs resulted in improved repeatability. CONCLUSION: Both calibration approaches provided reasonable absolute levels of GM CBF, although the calibration methods suffered from low signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in weak repeatability and difficulties in showing high degrees of correlation with pCASL measurements.
Authors: Manus J Donahue; Hanzhang Lu; Craig K Jones; Richard A E Edden; James J Pekar; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David E Crane; Manus J Donahue; Michael A Chappell; Ediri Sideso; Ashok Handa; James Kennedy; Peter Jezzard; Bradley J MacIntosh Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ken E Sakaie; Wanyong Shin; Kenneth R Curtin; Richard M McCarthy; Ty A Cashen; Timothy J Carroll Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jalal B Andre; Seema Nagpal; Daniel S Hippe; Ali C Ravanpay; Heiko Schmiedeskamp; Roland Bammer; Gerald J Palagallo; Lawrence Recht; Greg Zaharchuk Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2015-04-28
Authors: R M D'Ortenzio; S P Hojjat; R Vitorino; C G Cantrell; L Lee; A Feinstein; P O'Connor; T J Carroll; R I Aviv Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Antonia Kaiser; Liesbeth Reneman; Michelle M Solleveld; Bram F Coolen; Erik J A Scherder; Linda Knutsson; Atle Bjørnerud; Matthias J P van Osch; Jannie P Wijnen; Paul J Lucassen; Anouk Schrantee Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 4.157