Jalal B Andre1, Seema Nagpal2, Daniel S Hippe3, Ali C Ravanpay4, Heiko Schmiedeskamp5, Roland Bammer5, Gerald J Palagallo3, Lawrence Recht4, Greg Zaharchuk5. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Washington; Seattle, WA, USA Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA drjalal@uw.edu. 2. Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University; Stanford, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Washington; Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington; Seattle, WA, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Bevacizumab (BEV) is increasingly used to treat recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with some reported improvement in neurocognitive function despite potential neurotoxicities. We examined the effects of BEV on cerebral blood flow (CBF) within recurrent GBM tumor and in the contralateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory.Post-chemoradiation patients with histologically confirmed GBM were treated with BEV and underwent routine, serial tumor imaging with additional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (pcASL) following informed consent. Circular regions-of-interest were placed on pcASL images directly over the recurrent tumor and in the contralateral MCA territory. CBF changes before and during BEV treatment were evaluated in tumor and normal tissue. Linear mixed models were used to assess statistical significance.Fifty-three pcASL studies in 18 patients were acquired. Evaluation yielded lower mean tumoral CBF during BEV treatment compared with pre-treatment (45 ± 27 vs. 65 ± 27 ml/100 g/min, p = 0.002), and in the contralateral MCA territory during, compared with pre-BEV treatment (35 ± 8.4 vs. 41 ± 8.4 ml/100 g/min, p = 0.03). The decrease in mean CBF tended to be greater in the tumoral region than in the contralateral MCA, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (31% vs. 13%; p = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: BEV administration results in statistically significant global CBF decrease with a potentially preferential decrease in tumor perfusion compared with normal brain tissue.
UNLABELLED: Bevacizumab (BEV) is increasingly used to treat recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with some reported improvement in neurocognitive function despite potential neurotoxicities. We examined the effects of BEV on cerebral blood flow (CBF) within recurrent GBM tumor and in the contralateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory.Post-chemoradiation patients with histologically confirmed GBM were treated with BEV and underwent routine, serial tumor imaging with additional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (pcASL) following informed consent. Circular regions-of-interest were placed on pcASL images directly over the recurrent tumor and in the contralateral MCA territory. CBF changes before and during BEV treatment were evaluated in tumor and normal tissue. Linear mixed models were used to assess statistical significance.Fifty-three pcASL studies in 18 patients were acquired. Evaluation yielded lower mean tumoral CBF during BEV treatment compared with pre-treatment (45 ± 27 vs. 65 ± 27 ml/100 g/min, p = 0.002), and in the contralateral MCA territory during, compared with pre-BEV treatment (35 ± 8.4 vs. 41 ± 8.4 ml/100 g/min, p = 0.03). The decrease in mean CBF tended to be greater in the tumoral region than in the contralateral MCA, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (31% vs. 13%; p = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS:BEV administration results in statistically significant global CBF decrease with a potentially preferential decrease in tumor perfusion compared with normal brain tissue.
Authors: Carissa M White; Whitney B Pope; Taryar Zaw; Joe Qiao; Kourosh M Naeini; Albert Lai; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; J J Wang; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Emelie Lindgren; Ronnie Wirestam; Karin Markenroth Bloch; André Ahlgren; Matthias J P van Osch; Danielle van Westen; Yulia Surova; Freddy Ståhlberg; Linda Knutsson Journal: MAGMA Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Erlend Hodneland; Erik Hanson; Ove Sævareid; Geir Nævdal; Arvid Lundervold; Veronika Šoltészová; Antonella Z Munthe-Kaas; Andreas Deistung; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Jan M Nordbotten Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Jan Petr; Louise Hogeboom; Pavel Nikulin; Evita Wiegers; Gwen Schroyen; Jesper Kallehauge; Marek Chmelík; Patricia Clement; Ruben E Nechifor; Liviu-Andrei Fodor; Philip C De Witt Hamer; Frederik Barkhof; Cyril Pernet; Maarten Lequin; Sabine Deprez; Radim Jančálek; Henk J M M Mutsaerts; Francesca B Pizzini; Kyrre E Emblem; Vera C Keil Journal: MAGMA Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 2.310