Literature DB >> 24557861

Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters.

Luigi Sciarra1, Paolo Golia, Andrea Natalizia, Ermenegildo De Ruvo, Serena Dottori, Antonio Scarà, Alessio Borrelli, Lucia De Luca, Marco Rebecchi, Alessandro Fagagnini, Alberto Bandini, Fabrizio Guarracini, Marcello Galvani, Leonardo Calò.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). The SmartTouch catheter (STc) provides information about catheter tip to tissue contact force (CF). The Surround Flow catheter (SFc) provides a uniform cooling of the tip during ablation. We sought to analyze the impact of STc and SFc on CA of paroxysmal AF in terms of feasibility and acute efficacy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (mean age 57.6 ± 9.8 years, 53 males) with paroxysmal AF underwent pulmonary veins (PVs) antral isolation, by using standard ThermoCool catheter (TCc) in 21, STc in 21, and SFc in 21. Total procedural, fluoroscopy, and radiofrequency (RF) delivery times; percentage of persistently deconnected PVs after 30 min; and percentage of isolated PVs at the end of the procedure were measured. The use of both STc and SFc obtained a reduction of fluoroscopy time (TCc 34 ± 18 min, STc 20 ± 10 min, p < 0.001; SFc 21 ± 13 min, p = 0.02 vs TCc) and RF time (TCc 41 ± 13 min, STc 30 ± 14 min, p = 0.013; SFc 30 ± 9 min, p < 0.01 vs TCc). The use of STc resulted in a reduction of procedural time (TCc 181 ± 53 min, STc 140 ± 53 min, p < 0.001; SFc 170 ± 51 min, p = NS vs TCc). The percentage of isolated PVs was comparable between groups (TCc 96 % vs STc 98 % vs SFc 96 %; p = NS). The percentage of deconnected PVs at 30 min was lower in TCc (89 %) than in STc (95 %) and in SFc (95 %) group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both STc and SFc allowed a simplification of CA of paroxysmal AF. In addition, they reduced early PVs reconnection. Sixty-three patients with paroxysmal AF underwent ablation by standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, or Surround Flow catheter. Both the SmartTouch and the Surround Flow significantly reduced radiofrequency and fluoroscopy times, as well as pulmonary veins reconnection rate at 30 min. Moreover, the SmartTouch reduced overall duration of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557861     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-014-9874-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  24 in total

1.  Electrophysiological end point for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated from multiple pulmonary venous foci.

Authors:  M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; S Garrigue; A Takahashi; T Lavergne; M Hocini; J T Peng; R Roudaut; J Clémenty
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Dipen Shah; Josef Kautzner; Boris Schmidt; Nadir Saoudi; Claudia Herrera; Pierre Jaïs; Gerhard Hindricks; Petr Peichl; Aude Yulzari; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Neuzil; Andrea Natale; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Visualization of multiple catheters with electroanatomical mapping reduces X-ray exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Marco Scaglione; Luigi Biasco; Domenico Caponi; Matteo Anselmino; Andrea Negro; Paolo Di Donna; Antonella Corleto; Antonio Montefusco; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Contact force-controlled zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation of right-sided and left atrial arrhythmia substrates.

Authors:  Gunter Kerst; Hans-Jörg Weig; Slawomir Weretka; Peter Seizer; Michael Hofbeck; Meinrad Gawaz; Jürgen Schreieck
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Impact of ablation catheter irrigation design on silent cerebral embolism after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Scaglione; Alessandro Blandino; Cristina Raimondo; Domenico Caponi; Paolo Di Donna; Elisabetta Toso; Elisa Ebrille; Federico Cesarani; Eva Ferrarese; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-04-11

6.  Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique.

Authors:  Feifan Ouyang; Matthias Antz; Sabine Ernst; Hitoshi Hachiya; Hercules Mavrakis; Florian T Deger; Anselm Schaumann; Julian Chun; Peter Falk; Detlef Hennig; Xingpeng Liu; Dietmar Bänsch; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-12-27       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Reduced fluoroscopy exposure during ablation of atrial fibrillation using a novel electroanatomical navigation system: a multicentre experience.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Marco Scaglione; Maurizio del Greco; Roberto De Ponti; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Franco Zoppo; Ezio Soldati; Raffaella Marazzi; Massimiliano Marini; Fiorenzo Gaita; Assunta Iuliano; Emanuele Bertaglia
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation.

Authors:  Hakan Oral; Christoph Scharf; Aman Chugh; Burr Hall; Peter Cheung; Eric Good; Srikar Veerareddy; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation.

Authors:  H Nakagawa; W S Yamanashi; J V Pitha; M Arruda; X Wang; K Ohtomo; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; R Lazzara; W M Jackman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Incidence and time course of early recovery of pulmonary vein conduction after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Aamir Cheema; Jun Dong; Darshan Dalal; Joseph E Marine; Charles A Henrikson; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Saman Nazarian; Kenneth Bilchick; Sunil Sinha; Daniel Scherr; Ibrahim Almasry; Henry Halperin; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-04
View more
  21 in total

1.  Respiratory gating algorithm helps to reconstruct more accurate electroanatomical maps during atrial fibrillation ablation performed under spontaneous respiration.

Authors:  Gábor Széplaki; László Gellér; Emin Evren Özcan; Tamás Tahin; Orsolya Mária Kovács; Nóra Parázs; Júlia Karády; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Szabolcs Szilágyi; István Osztheimer; Attila Tóth; Béla Merkely
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Clinical experience with contact-force and flexible-tip ablation catheter designs.

Authors:  N Deubner; H Greiss; E Akkaya; A Berkowitsch; S Zaltsberg; C W Hamm; M Kuniss; T Neumann
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Radiation Dose is Significantly Reduced by Use of Contact Force Sensing Catheter During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio De Simone; Francesco Solimene; Assunta Iuliano; Vincenzo La Rocca; Vincenzo Schillaci; Alfonso Panella; Gergana Shopova; Felice Nappi; Francesco Urraro; Giovanni Russo; Giovanni Napolitano; Paola Chiariello
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  Impact of computed tomography image and contact force technology on catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ibrahim Marai; Mahmoud Suleiman; Miry Blich; Jonathan Lessick; Sobhi Abadi; Monther Boulos
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-26

5.  Porous tip contact force-sensing catheters for pulmonary vein isolation: performance in a clinical routine setting.

Authors:  Tobias Plenge; Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck; Jakob Lüker; Arian Sultan; Daniel Steven
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation: Considerations For Repeat Ablation And Strategies To Optimize Success.

Authors:  Andrew E Darby
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 7.  Is pulmonary vein isolation still the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation?

Authors:  T Jared Bunch; Michael J Cutler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Superior efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with online contact force measurement persists after the learning period: a prospective case control study.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; Johan B Saenen; Wim Bories; Hielko P Miljoen; Sara Nullens; Christiaan J Vrints; Andrea Sarkozy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 10.  Better Lesion Creation And Assessment During Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Samuel Balindger; Roy M John; Laurence M Epstein; Bruce A Koplan; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.